• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations.

作者信息

Mertz-Fairhurst E J, Call-Smith K M, Shuster G S, Williams J E, Davis Q B, Smith C D, Bell R A, Sherrer J D, Myers D R, Morse P K

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912-0200.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Nov;115(5):689-94. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0288.

DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0288
PMID:3479490
Abstract

The 2-year clinical evaluations of paired occlusal restorations are presented. Each study participant received a sealed composite restoration placed over a carious lesion and either a traditional outline-form (unsealed) amalgam or an ultraconservative sealed amalgam restoration. Caries was removed before placement of both types of amalgam restorations. No important clinical differences developed among the three groups of restorations.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Nov;115(5):689-94. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0288.
2
Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
Quintessence Int. 1992 Dec;23(12):827-38.
3
Sealed restorations: 5-year results.封闭修复体:5年随访结果
Am J Dent. 1992 Feb;5(1):5-10.
4
Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Jan;129(1):55-66. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0022.
5
Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.防龋和超保守性封闭修复:儿童和成人的九年随访结果
ASDC J Dent Child. 1995 Mar-Apr;62(2):97-107.
6
Sealed restorations: 4-year results.封闭修复体:4年随访结果。
Am J Dent. 1991 Feb;4(1):43-9.
7
Ultraconservative sealed restorations: three-year results.超保守性封闭修复:三年随访结果
J Public Health Dent. 1991 Fall;51(4):239-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1991.tb02222.x.
8
Microleakage and wall adaptation of conservative restorations.保守性修复体的微渗漏与边缘适应性
Am J Dent. 2002 Dec;15(6):407-11.
9
The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A clinical trial comparing a minimal composite restoration with an occlusal amalgam restoration.
Br Dent J. 1988 May 7;164(9):288-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806431.
10
Caries preventive effect of occlusal sealant extension to ART restorations compared with non-extended amalgam restorations.与未扩展的汞合金修复体相比,窝沟封闭剂扩展至非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体的防龋效果。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007;5(1):55-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral microbial interactions from an ecological perspective: a narrative review.从生态学角度看口腔微生物相互作用:一篇综述
Front Oral Health. 2023 Sep 13;4:1229118. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1229118. eCollection 2023.
2
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.治疗龋坏或牙本质龋损的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2.
3
Selective persistence of Propionibacterium species FMA5 following sealing of infected dentinal matrix.感染牙本质基质封闭后丙酸杆菌属FMA5的选择性持续存在。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 May;36(5):869-878. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2875-6. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
4
Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial.乳牙窝沟封闭与部分去腐治疗的随机临床试验
BMC Oral Health. 2014 May 28;14:58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-58.
5
Influence of dental materials used for sealing caries lesions on laser fluorescence measurements.用于封闭龋损的牙科材料对激光荧光测量的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Mar;27(2):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0856-z. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
6
Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review.通过完全挖除或部分去除治疗深龋病变:一项批判性综述。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Jun;139(6):705-12. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0252.