• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

防龋和超保守性封闭修复:儿童和成人的九年随访结果

Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.

作者信息

Mertz-Fairhurst E J, Adair S M, Sams D R, Curtis J W, Ergle J W, Hawkins K I, Mackert J R, O'Dell N L, Richards E E, Rueggeberg F

机构信息

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, The Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912, USA.

出版信息

ASDC J Dent Child. 1995 Mar-Apr;62(2):97-107.

PMID:7608378
Abstract

The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of placing sealed posterior composite restorations for arresting active caries. The tooth preparation for this bonded and sealed restoration was limited to placing a bevel in the enamel only, without the removal of the carious lesion. The radiographic and clinical performance of these ultraconservative sealed composite restorations placed over caries (CompS/C) was compared over a period of nine years with: 1) ultraconservative, localized sealed amalgam (AGS) restorations with no extension for prevention, and 2) traditional, unsealed amalgam restorations (AGU) with the usual extension for prevention outline form. Sealant retention with > 50 percent to 100 percent of the margins occurred in 64 percent of CompS/C and 82.5 percent of AGS restorations. After nine years the cumulative failure rates were 16 percent for CompS/C, 2.5 percent for AGS, and 17.1 percent for AGU restorations. Thus, the clinical performance of CompS/C restorations was slightly superior to that of the traditional AGU restorations. The AGS restorations were definitely superior to the traditional AGU restorations and to the CompS/C restorations in both children and adults alike. Complete sealant retention over CompS/C and AGS restorations was equivalent between children and adults (P = 0.14 and 0.74, respectively). A higher percentage of open margins in CompS/C restorations was seen, however, in children (17.4 percent) than adults (1.94 percent). This study has shown that Class I caries can be arrested by the CompS/C restoration.

摘要

这项临床研究的目的是评估放置密封后牙复合树脂修复体以阻止活动性龋病的长期疗效。这种粘结和密封修复体的牙体预备仅限于在釉质上制备一个斜面,而不去除龋损。将这些放置在龋损上的超保守密封复合树脂修复体(CompS/C)的影像学和临床性能与以下情况进行了为期九年的比较:1)无预防性扩展的超保守局部密封银汞合金(AGS)修复体,以及2)具有常规预防性扩展外形的传统非密封银汞合金修复体(AGU)。CompS/C修复体边缘密封剂保留率>50%至100%的情况在64%的病例中出现,AGS修复体为82.5%。九年后,CompS/C修复体的累积失败率为16%,AGS为2.5%,AGU修复体为17.1%。因此,CompS/C修复体的临床性能略优于传统的AGU修复体。AGS修复体在儿童和成人中均明显优于传统的AGU修复体和CompS/C修复体。CompS/C和AGS修复体的完全密封剂保留率在儿童和成人中相当(P值分别为0.14和0.74)。然而,CompS/C修复体中儿童出现开放边缘的比例(17.4%)高于成人(1.94%)。这项研究表明,I类龋病可以通过CompS/C修复体得到控制。

相似文献

1
Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.防龋和超保守性封闭修复:儿童和成人的九年随访结果
ASDC J Dent Child. 1995 Mar-Apr;62(2):97-107.
2
Sealed restorations: 5-year results.封闭修复体:5年随访结果
Am J Dent. 1992 Feb;5(1):5-10.
3
Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
Quintessence Int. 1992 Dec;23(12):827-38.
4
Sealed restorations: 4-year results.封闭修复体:4年随访结果。
Am J Dent. 1991 Feb;4(1):43-9.
5
Ultraconservative sealed restorations: three-year results.超保守性封闭修复:三年随访结果
J Public Health Dent. 1991 Fall;51(4):239-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1991.tb02222.x.
6
The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration: nine-year results.预防性树脂(复合树脂/窝沟封闭剂)修复:九年随访结果
Quintessence Int. 1994 Mar;25(3):155-9.
7
Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Jan;129(1):55-66. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0022.
8
Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Nov;115(5):689-94. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0288.
9
Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.6至30个月后乳磨牙II类银汞合金与复合树脂联合修复体的临床评估
ASDC J Dent Child. 1996 Sep-Oct;63(5):341-5.
10
Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.预防性树脂修复与汞合金修复:一项为期三年的临床研究。
J Tenn Dent Assoc. 1997 Oct;77(4):36-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.治疗龋坏或牙本质龋损的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2.
2
Calibration of dentists for Caries Management by Risk Assessment Research in a Practice Based Research Network - CAMBRA PBRN.基于实践的研究网络中龋齿管理风险评估研究(CAMBRA PBRN)对牙医的校准。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jan 4;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0457-3.
3
The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS™) An Example of a Caries Management Pathway.
国际龋病分类与管理系统(ICCMS™):龋病管理路径示例
BMC Oral Health. 2015;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S9. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
4
A new paradigm for operative dentistry.口腔手术学的一种新范式。
J Conserv Dent. 2008 Jan;11(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.43411.
5
Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria.乳牙活髓切断术:根据标准化标准对文献的综述
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):64-71; discussion 72. doi: 10.1007/BF03320817.