皮肤鳞状细胞癌分期可能会影响使用者的治疗管理:一项调查研究。

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma staging may influence management in users: A survey study.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2022 Jan;11(1):94-103. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4426. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine whether there is consensus regarding staging and management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) across the various specialties that manage this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey regarding CSCC high-risk features, staging, and management was created and emailed to cutaneous oncology experts including dermatology, head and neck surgery/surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-six (46%) of 357 invited physicians completed the survey. Depth of invasion (92%), perineural invasion (99%), histologic differentiation (85%), and patient immunosuppression (90%) achieved consensus (>80%) as high-risk features of CSCC. Dermatologists were more likely to also choose clinical tumor diameter (79% vs. 54%) and histology (99% vs. 66%) as a high-risk feature. Dermatologists were also more likely to utilize the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) staging system alone or in conjunction with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (71%), whereas other cancer specialists (OCS) tend to use only AJCC (71%). Respondents considered AJCC T3 and higher (90%) and BWH T2b and higher (100%) to be high risk and when they consider radiologic imaging, sentinel lymph node biopsy, post-operative radiation therapy, and increased follow-up. Notably, a large number of respondents do not use staging systems or tumor stage to determine treatment options beyond surgery in high-risk CSCC.

CONCLUSION

This survey study highlights areas of consensus and differences regarding the definition of high-risk features of CSCC, staging approaches, and management patterns between dermatologists and OCS. High-risk CSCC is defined as, but not limited to, BWH T2b and higher and AJCC T3 and higher, and these thresholds can be used to identify cases for which treatment beyond surgery may be considered. Dermatologists are more likely to utilize BWH staging, likely because BWH validation studies showing advantages over AJCC were published in dermatology journals and discussed at dermatology meetings. Additional data are necessary to develop a comprehensive risk-based management approach for CSCC.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在管理皮肤鳞状细胞癌(CSCC)的各种专业中,对于 CSCC 的分期和治疗是否存在共识。

材料与方法

创建了一项关于 CSCC 高危特征、分期和治疗的调查,并通过电子邮件发送给皮肤科肿瘤专家,包括皮肤科、头颈部外科/肿瘤外科、放射肿瘤学和肿瘤内科。

结果

在 357 名受邀医生中,有 156 名(46%)完成了调查。侵袭深度(92%)、神经周围侵犯(99%)、组织学分化(85%)和患者免疫抑制(90%)作为 CSCC 的高危特征达成了共识(>80%)。皮肤科医生更有可能选择临床肿瘤直径(79%对 54%)和组织学(99%对 66%)作为高危特征。皮肤科医生也更倾向于单独使用或结合美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)使用布莱根妇女医院(BWH)分期系统(71%),而其他癌症专家(OCS)则倾向于仅使用 AJCC(71%)。受访者认为 AJCC T3 及以上(90%)和 BWH T2b 及以上(100%)为高危,且在考虑影像学检查、前哨淋巴结活检、术后放疗和增加随访时也是如此。值得注意的是,大量受访者在高风险 CSCC 中,除了手术之外,并不使用分期系统或肿瘤分期来确定治疗选择。

结论

这项调查研究突出了皮肤科医生和 OCS 之间在 CSCC 高危特征的定义、分期方法和治疗模式方面的共识和差异。高风险 CSCC 的定义不仅限于 BWH T2b 及以上和 AJCC T3 及以上,这些阈值可用于识别可能需要手术以外治疗的病例。皮肤科医生更倾向于使用 BWH 分期,可能是因为在皮肤科杂志上发表了 BWH 验证研究,表明其优于 AJCC,并在皮肤科会议上进行了讨论。需要进一步的数据来制定 CSCC 的综合风险为基础的管理方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f4/8704160/af36e58425a9/CAM4-11-94-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索