Farberg Aaron S, Fitzgerald Alison L, Ibrahim Sherrif F, Tolkachjov Stan N, Soleymani Teo, Douglas Leah M, Kurley Sarah J, Arron Sarah T
Baylor Scott & White Health System, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Castle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Feb;12(2):267-284. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00673-y. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common form of skin cancer, and the number of deaths due to cSCC is estimated to be greater than the number attributed to melanoma. While the majority of cSCC tumors are resectable with clear margins by standard excision practices, some lesions exhibit high-risk factors for which there is evidence of their association with recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death. The most commonly used staging systems and guidelines in the USA for cSCC are based on these clinical and pathologic high-risk factors; however, these are limited in their ability to predict adverse events, thus posing a challenge for implementing risk-directed patient management. Since the development of local recurrence and/or metastasis has a profound impact on the survival of patients with cSCC, accurate identification of patients at high risk for poor outcomes is critical, potentially allowing for early and appropriate adjuvant therapy. This review summarizes the current cSCC literature with a focus on how differing clinical assessments within each of the five selected risk factors (perineural invasion, differentiation, depth of invasion, size, and location) can influence the evaluation of patient outcomes, along with summarizing the utility of staging and guidelines, and highlighting the potential for molecular tools to improve upon cSCC risk assessment.
皮肤鳞状细胞癌(cSCC)是第二常见的皮肤癌形式,据估计,cSCC导致的死亡人数超过黑色素瘤导致的死亡人数。虽然大多数cSCC肿瘤可通过标准切除手术实现切缘清晰切除,但一些病变具有高危因素,有证据表明这些因素与复发、转移和疾病特异性死亡相关。美国最常用的cSCC分期系统和指南基于这些临床和病理高危因素;然而,它们预测不良事件的能力有限,因此对实施风险导向的患者管理构成挑战。由于局部复发和/或转移的发生对cSCC患者的生存有深远影响,准确识别预后不良的高危患者至关重要,这可能有助于早期进行适当的辅助治疗。本综述总结了当前cSCC的文献,重点关注五个选定风险因素(神经周围浸润、分化程度、浸润深度、大小和位置)中每个因素的不同临床评估如何影响患者预后的评估,同时总结分期和指南的效用,并强调分子工具在改善cSCC风险评估方面的潜力。