Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
J Pathol Clin Res. 2022 Mar;8(2):101-115. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.251. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
Digital Pathology (DP) is a platform which has the potential to develop a truly integrated and global pathology community. The generation of DP data at scale creates novel challenges for the histopathology community in managing, processing, and governing the use of these data. The current understanding of, and confidence in, the legal and ethical aspects of DP by pathologists is unknown. We developed an electronic survey (e-survey), comprising 22 questions, with input from the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Digital Pathology Working Group. The e-survey was circulated via e-mail and social media (Twitter) through the RCPath Digital Pathology Working Group network, RCPath Trainee Committee network, the Pathology image data Lake for Analytics, Knowledge and Education (PathLAKE) digital pathology consortium, National Pathology Imaging Co-operative (NPIC), local contacts, and to the membership of both The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and the British Division of the International Academy of Pathology (BDIAP). Between 14 July 2020 and 6 September 2020, we collected 198 responses representing a cross section of histopathologists, including individuals with experience of DP research. We ascertained that, in the UK, DP is being used for diagnosis, research, and teaching, and that the platform is enabling data sharing. Our survey demonstrated that there is often a lack of confidence and understanding of the key issues of consent, legislation, and ethical guidelines. Of 198 respondents, 82 (41%) did not know when the use of digital scanned slide images would fall under the relevant legislation and 93 (47%) were 'Not confident at all' in their interpretation of consent for scanned slide images in research. With increasing uptake of DP, a working knowledge of these areas is essential but histopathologists often express a lack of confidence in these topics. The need for specific training in these areas is highlighted by the findings of this study.
数字病理学(DP)是一个有潜力发展真正集成和全球化病理学社区的平台。DP 数据的规模化生成给组织病理学社区在管理、处理和管理这些数据的使用方面带来了新的挑战。病理学家对 DP 的法律和伦理方面的理解和信心目前尚不清楚。我们开发了一个由 22 个问题组成的电子调查(e-survey),并得到了皇家病理学院(RCPath)数字病理学工作组的投入。该 e-survey 通过 RCPath 数字病理学工作组网络、RCPath 学员委员会网络、分析、知识和教育的病理学图像数据湖(PathLAKE)数字病理学联盟、国家病理学成像合作组织(NPIC)、当地联系人以及英国大不列颠病理学会和国际病理学院英国分部(BDIAP)的成员,通过电子邮件和社交媒体(Twitter)进行了分发。在 2020 年 7 月 14 日至 9 月 6 日期间,我们共收到了 198 份回复,代表了组织病理学家的一个横断面,其中包括有 DP 研究经验的个人。我们确定,在英国,DP 正在用于诊断、研究和教学,并且该平台正在实现数据共享。我们的调查表明,人们对同意、立法和道德准则的关键问题往往缺乏信心和理解。在 198 名受访者中,82 名(41%)不知道何时使用数字扫描载玻片图像将属于相关立法范围,93 名(47%)对研究中扫描载玻片图像的同意解释“完全没有信心”。随着 DP 的日益普及,对这些领域的了解是必不可少的,但病理学家经常对这些话题表示缺乏信心。本研究的结果突出了这些领域特定培训的必要性。