Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Vasc Access. 2024 May;25(3):753-758. doi: 10.1177/11297298211027470. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Thrombolysis for arteriovenous grafts (AVG) yields high technical success rates, however, long-term outcomes are unclear. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to analyze 5-year patency rates following AVG thrombolysis.
All patients who underwent AVG thrombolysis between 2005 and 2015 at three academic hospitals were included. Prospectively maintained institutional nephrology and radiology databases were used to record demographic, clinical, and AVG characteristics. The primary outcome was primary patency, defined as AVG access survival without re-intervention including angioplasty ± stent with/without re-thrombolysis. Secondary outcomes were assisted primary patency and cumulative patency, defined as AVG access survival until re-thrombosis requiring re-thrombolysis or abandonment, respectively. Technical success was defined as restoration of flow with <30% residual stenosis. Patients were followed until 2017. Patency rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards were calculated to determine associations between covariates and patency loss.
Seventy-four patients underwent AVG thrombolysis during the study period with a median follow-up period of 21.4 (IQR 8.3-42.8) months. The average age was 58.6 years with a high rate of comorbidities, including hypertension (82.4%) and diabetes (54.1%). Thrombolysis technical success was 96%. There were 147 re-interventions in 46 patients, of which 98 were re-thrombolysis (mean re-intervention rate of 1.27/patient/year). Primary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years were 43.2%, 20.2%, and 7.7%. Assisted primary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years were 47.5%, 20.2%, and 7.7%. Cumulative patency at 1, 3, and 5 years were 75.0%, 38.8%, and 22.6%. Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated no associations between demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and patency rates.
Despite a high technical success rate, thrombolysis for AVG dysfunction is associated with poor long-term patency. Future studies are needed to determine risk factors for re-thrombosis to identify patients who will benefit from AVG thrombolysis in the long-term.
动静脉移植物(AVG)溶栓治疗的技术成功率较高,但长期效果尚不清楚。我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,以分析 AVG 溶栓后 5 年的通畅率。
纳入 2005 年至 2015 年期间在 3 家学术医院接受 AVG 溶栓治疗的所有患者。前瞻性维护的机构肾病学和放射学数据库用于记录人口统计学、临床和 AVG 特征。主要结局是原发性通畅率,定义为 AVG 通路无再干预的存活率,包括血管成形术±支架植入,有/无再次溶栓。次要结局是辅助原发性通畅率和累积通畅率,分别定义为 AVG 通路直到需要再次溶栓或放弃的血栓再形成的存活率。技术成功定义为恢复血流,残余狭窄<30%。患者随访至 2017 年。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析评估通畅率,并计算 Cox 比例风险以确定协变量与通畅丧失之间的关联。
研究期间共有 74 例患者接受 AVG 溶栓治疗,中位随访时间为 21.4(IQR 8.3-42.8)个月。平均年龄为 58.6 岁,合并症发生率高,包括高血压(82.4%)和糖尿病(54.1%)。溶栓技术成功率为 96%。46 例患者中有 147 例再干预,其中 98 例再次溶栓(平均每年 1.27 例/患者)。1、3、5 年的原发性通畅率分别为 43.2%、20.2%和 7.7%。1、3、5 年的辅助原发性通畅率分别为 47.5%、20.2%和 7.7%。1、3、5 年的累积通畅率分别为 75.0%、38.8%和 22.6%。Cox 比例风险分析表明,人口统计学、临床和手术特征与通畅率之间无关联。
尽管技术成功率较高,但 AVG 功能障碍的溶栓治疗与长期通畅率较差有关。需要进一步研究确定再血栓形成的危险因素,以确定哪些患者将从长期的 AVG 溶栓治疗中受益。