Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1379-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2366.
Critical access hospitals (CAHs) provide inpatient care to Americans living in rural communities. These hospitals are at high risk of falling behind with respect to quality improvement, owing to their limited resources and vulnerable patient populations. How they have fared on patient outcomes during the past decade is unknown.
To evaluate trends in mortality for patients receiving care at CAHs and compare these trends with those for patients receiving care at non-CAHs.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective observational study using data from Medicare fee-for-service patients admitted to US acute care hospitals with acute myocardial infarction (1,902,586 admissions), congestive heart failure (4,488,269 admissions), and pneumonia (3,891,074 admissions) between 2002 and 2010.
Trends in risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rates for CAHs and other acute care US hospitals.
Accounting for differences in patient, hospital, and community characteristics, CAHs had mortality rates comparable with those of non-CAHs in 2002 (composite mortality across all 3 conditions, 12.8% vs 13.0%; difference, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.7% to 0.2%]; P = .25). Between 2002 and 2010, mortality rates increased 0.1% per year in CAHs but decreased 0.2% per year in non-CAHs, for an annual difference in change of 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2% to 0.3%; P < .001). Thus, by 2010, CAHs had higher mortality rates compared with non-CAHs (13.3% vs 11.4%; difference, 1.8% [95% CI, 1.4% to 2.2%]; P < .001). The patterns were similar when each individual condition was examined separately. Comparing CAHs with other small, rural hospitals, similar patterns were found.
Among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia, 30-day mortality rates for those admitted to CAHs, compared with those admitted to other acute care hospitals, increased from 2002 to 2010. New efforts may be needed to help CAHs improve.
提供给美国农村社区居民住院服务的关键通道医院(CAHs)面临着质量改进的高风险,这是由于其资源有限和脆弱的患者群体。在过去十年中,它们在患者预后方面的表现如何尚不清楚。
评估在 CAHs 接受治疗的患者的死亡率趋势,并将这些趋势与在非 CAHs 接受治疗的患者进行比较。
设计、设置和患者: 使用 2002 年至 2010 年期间美国急性护理医院收治的 Medicare 按服务收费患者的急性心肌梗死(1902586 例住院)、充血性心力衰竭(4488269 例住院)和肺炎(3891074 例住院)的数据,进行回顾性观察性研究。
CAHs 和其他美国急性护理医院的 30 天风险调整死亡率趋势。
在考虑患者、医院和社区特征差异的情况下,CAHs 在 2002 年与非 CAHs 的死亡率相当(所有 3 种疾病的综合死亡率,12.8%比 13.0%;差异,-0.3%[95%CI,-0.7%至 0.2%];P=.25)。在 2002 年至 2010 年期间,CAHs 的死亡率每年增加 0.1%,而非 CAHs 的死亡率每年下降 0.2%,每年变化差异为 0.3%(95%CI,0.2%至 0.3%;P <.001)。因此,到 2010 年,CAHs 的死亡率高于非 CAHs(13.3%比 11.4%;差异,1.8%[95%CI,1.4%至 2.2%];P <.001)。当单独检查每种疾病时,也存在类似的模式。在比较接受 CAHs 治疗和其他小型农村医院治疗的 Medicare 受惠者时,也发现了类似的模式。
在接受 Medicare 治疗的急性心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭或肺炎患者中,与接受其他急性护理医院治疗的患者相比,2002 年至 2010 年期间,入住 CAHs 的患者的 30 天死亡率有所上升。可能需要新的努力来帮助 CAHs 提高。