School of Nursing and Midwifery, Center for Quality and Patient Safety Research and Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 May;72(3):266-286. doi: 10.3322/caac.21709. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Smoking cessation reduces the risk of death, improves recovery, and reduces the risk of hospital readmission. Evidence and policy support hospital admission as an ideal time to deliver smoking-cessation interventions. However, this is not well implemented in practice. In this systematic review, the authors summarize the literature on smoking-cessation implementation strategies and evaluate their success to guide the implementation of best-practice smoking interventions into hospital settings. The CINAHL Complete, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, and PsycInfo databases were searched using terms associated with the following topics: smoking cessation, hospitals, and implementation. In total, 14,287 original records were identified and screened, resulting in 63 eligible articles from 56 studies. Data were extracted on the study characteristics, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes were guided by Proctor and colleagues' framework and included acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. The findings demonstrate that studies predominantly focused on the training of staff to achieve implementation. Brief implementation approaches using a small number of implementation strategies were less successful and poorly sustained compared with well resourced and multicomponent approaches. Although brief implementation approaches may be viewed as advantageous because they are less resource-intensive, their capacity to change practice in a sustained way lacks evidence. Attempts to change clinician behavior or introduce new models of care are challenging in a short time frame, and implementation efforts should be designed for long-term success. There is a need to embrace strategic, well planned implementation approaches to embed smoking-cessation interventions into hospitals and to reap and sustain the benefits for people who smoke.
戒烟可降低死亡风险、促进康复并降低再次住院的风险。有证据和政策支持将住院作为实施戒烟干预的理想时机。然而,在实践中这一目标并未很好地实现。在本次系统评价中,作者对戒烟实施策略的相关文献进行了总结,并评估了其实施效果,旨在为将最佳实践的戒烟干预措施引入医院环境提供指导。作者使用与以下主题相关的术语对 CINAHL Complete、Embase、MEDLINE Complete 和 PsycInfo 数据库进行了检索:戒烟、医院和实施。共确定了 14287 份原始记录,并对其进行了筛选,最终从 56 项研究中确定了 63 篇符合条件的文章。作者对研究特征、实施策略和实施结果进行了数据提取。实施结果的评估以 Proctor 及其同事的框架为指导,包括可接受性、采纳、适宜性、成本、可行性、保真度、渗透度和可持续性。研究结果表明,研究主要侧重于对员工进行培训以实现实施。与资源丰富且多组分的方法相比,使用少量实施策略的简短实施方法的成功率较低且难以持续。虽然简短的实施方法因其资源需求较低而被认为具有优势,但缺乏持续改变实践的证据。在短时间内尝试改变临床医生的行为或引入新的护理模式具有挑战性,实施工作应设计为长期成功。需要采取战略性、精心规划的实施方法,将戒烟干预措施嵌入医院,并从中受益并持续为吸烟者提供支持。