US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(1):67-74. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.2008070. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
As the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan end, the US military has begun to transition to the multi-domain operations concept with preparation for large scale combat operations against a near-peer adversary. In large scale combat operations, the deployed trauma system will likely see challenges not experienced during the Global War on Terrorism. The development of science and technology will be critical to close existing capability gaps and optimize casualty survival. This review comprises a framework of deployed trauma care to provide nonmilitary investigators a general understanding of our deployed trauma care system. Trauma care begins at the Role 1 which encompasses all care from the point of injury and the battalion aid station, through transport to the Role 2 or forward staged mobile surgical team such as a Forward Resuscitative Surgical Detachment. Role 1 point of injury care approximates the care delivered by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel. The Battalion Aid Station approximates the care available at a freestanding emergency center with significant differences in training level of the providers, number of beds, and diagnostic capabilities. Role 2 medical care is part of an area support medical company with surgical capabilities. The Role 2 represents the first role of care which provides damage control surgery. This capability approximates a small community hospital with the primary difference being limited patient holding capacity and reduced diagnostic equipment. The Role 3 field hospital is the largest military treatment facility in the deployed setting. The Role 3 approximates a civilian level 2 trauma center with smaller holding capabilities and diagnostic abilities limited to that of a computed tomography (CT) scanner and less.
随着伊拉克和阿富汗战争的结束,美国军队已经开始向多领域作战概念过渡,为与近敌进行大规模作战行动做准备。在大规模作战行动中,部署的创伤系统可能会遇到在全球反恐战争中从未经历过的挑战。科学技术的发展对于缩小现有能力差距和优化伤员生存至关重要。本综述构建了一个部署创伤护理框架,为非军事调查人员提供了对我们部署创伤护理系统的一般了解。创伤护理始于第 1 级,涵盖了从受伤点和营救护站开始的所有护理,通过运输到第 2 级或前进的移动外科手术团队,如前进复苏外科分遣队。第 1 级受伤点护理类似于急诊医疗服务(EMS)人员提供的护理。营救护站类似于独立的紧急中心,提供者的培训水平、床位数量和诊断能力存在显著差异。第 2 级医疗护理是区域支援医疗连的一部分,具有外科能力。第 2 级代表了提供损伤控制手术的第一个护理级别。这种能力类似于小型社区医院,主要区别在于患者容纳能力有限,诊断设备减少。野战医院是部署环境中最大的军事治疗设施。第 3 级野战医院类似于民用 2 级创伤中心,容纳能力较小,诊断能力仅限于 CT 扫描仪和更少。