Gerhardt Robert T
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
US Army Med Dep J. 2011 Apr-Jun:82-6.
Minimizing preventable death continues to be a primary focus of the combat casualty care research community, and of the Army Medical Department as a whole. Toward that end, tremendous successes have been realized in resuscitative surgery, critical care, rehabilitation, preventive medicine, and in our collective ability to project effective medical care into the most austere locations throughout the globe. Innovation in the care rendered outside of theater hospitals or strategic air evacuation conveyances, however, has not kept the same pace. The US military experience in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam served as a prime source for the development of the tactics, techniques, and procedures which spawned modern civilian sector trauma care and emergency medical services. But this ascendance was driven by the dedicated medics, corpsmen, physicians, nurses, and allied health practitioners from those conflicts who left the military for the civilian sector, leaving their replacements, in many cases, to repeat the same mistakes, and to relearn hard lessons that otherwise might have been assimilated had they been effectively captured and integrated into doctrine and training. A prime example of this phenomenon is the recent acknowledgement of the "en route care gap" existing in tactical medical evacuation. The US Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) and the Army emergency medicine community have made a significant commitment toward elucidating the requirements, capability gaps, and a way-forward in search of the development of an integrated prehospital combat casualty care system, nested within the Joint Theater Trauma System. This paper examines specific research programs, concept development, and collaborations with other Army, joint, and civilian center organizations which comprise the USAISR Prehospital and Emergency Care Research Program, including the Remote Damage Control Resuscitation initiative, Emergency Telemedical Direction of Role-I providers, Combat Medical Voice Documentation System, and establishment of the Remote Trauma Outcomes Research Network.
将可预防的死亡降至最低仍然是战斗伤员护理研究界以及整个陆军医疗部门的主要关注点。为此,在复苏手术、重症护理、康复、预防医学以及我们将有效医疗服务投送到全球最艰苦地区的集体能力方面已经取得了巨大成功。然而,战区外医院或战略空中后送运输工具之外所提供护理的创新却未能跟上同样的步伐。美国军队在第二次世界大战、朝鲜战争和越南战争中的经验是发展战术、技术和程序的主要来源,这些战术、技术和程序催生了现代民用创伤护理和紧急医疗服务。但这种优势是由那些冲突中的敬业医护兵、卫生兵、医生、护士和相关医疗从业者推动的,他们离开军队进入民用部门,在许多情况下,让他们的替代者重复同样的错误,并重新吸取那些本可以被吸收的惨痛教训,要是这些教训能被有效地纳入条令和训练中的话。这种现象的一个主要例子是最近对战术医疗后送中存在的“途中护理差距”的认识。美国陆军外科研究所(USAISR)和陆军急诊医学界已经做出了重大承诺,致力于阐明需求、能力差距以及寻求发展一个嵌套在联合战区创伤系统内的综合院前战斗伤员护理系统的前进方向。本文审视了构成USAISR院前和紧急护理研究项目的具体研究计划、概念开发以及与其他陆军、联合和民用中心组织的合作,包括远程损伤控制复苏倡议、一级提供者的紧急远程医疗指导、战斗医疗语音记录系统以及远程创伤结果研究网络的建立。