透明度：信任准则的核心原则。
Transparency: A central principle underpinning trustworthy guidelines.
机构信息
Science Division, World Health Organization, Ave Appia 21, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Science Division, World Health Organization, Ave Appia 21, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
出版信息
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:246-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.025. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
Abstract
• The development of trustworthy guidelines follows a range of principles. • In response to the Covid pandemic there was an urgent need for guidelines to respond to a wide range of clinical and public health challenges; timelines became contracted and evidence was frequently lacking or of poor quality. • For guideline development the World Health Organization, it became clear that one of the most important principles to adhere to is transparency as this underpins all other principles of guideline development.
摘要
• 制定可靠的指南遵循一系列原则。 • 应对新冠疫情大流行期间，迫切需要制定指南来应对广泛的临床和公共卫生挑战；时间线变得紧张，证据经常缺乏或质量较差。 • 对于世界卫生组织的指南制定工作来说，很明显，需要坚持的最重要原则之一是透明度，因为这是所有其他指南制定原则的基础。
相似文献
1
Transparency: A central principle underpinning trustworthy guidelines.透明度：信任准则的核心原则。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:246-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.025. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
2
A trustworthy AI reality-check: the lack of transparency of artificial intelligence products in healthcare.值得信赖的人工智能事实核查：医疗保健领域人工智能产品缺乏透明度
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 20;6:1267290. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1267290. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices.评估《促进透明度与开放性（TOP）指南》的实施情况：用于评估期刊政策、程序和实践的TRUST流程
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Jun 2;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00112-8.
4
Automatic transparency evaluation for open knowledge extraction systems.自动透明度评估用于开放知识提取系统。
J Biomed Semantics. 2023 Aug 31;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13326-023-00293-9.
5
Trustworthy evidence-based versus untrustworthy guidelines: detecting the difference.可靠的循证与不可靠的指南：发现差异。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002437.
6
Getting trustworthy guidelines into the hands of decision-makers and supporting their consideration of contextual factors for implementation globally: recommendation mapping of COVID-19 guidelines.将可靠的指南交到决策者手中，并支持他们在全球范围内考虑实施的背景因素：对 COVID-19 指南的推荐映射。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
7
Are the Institute of Medicine's trustworthiness guidelines trustworthy?美国医学研究所的可信度指南可信吗？
R I Med J (2013). 2013 Jul 30;96(8):13-4.
8
Piloting a Survey-Based Assessment of Transparency and Trustworthiness with Three Medical AI Tools.使用三款医学人工智能工具对透明度和可信度进行基于调查的评估试点。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;10(10):1923. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101923.
9
Human Performance Benefits of The Automation Transparency Design Principle : Validation and Variation.自动化透明度设计原则对人类绩效的益处：验证与变化
Hum Factors. 2021 May;63(3):379-401. doi: 10.1177/0018720819887252. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
10
Commentary - From Transparency to Accountability: Finding Ways to Make Expert Advice Trustworthy.评论——从透明度到问责制：寻找使专家建议值得信赖的方法。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Feb;17(3):28-33. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26731.
引用本文的文献
1
Best practices for guideline development in Critical Care.重症监护指南制定的最佳实践。
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Feb 28;37:e20250372. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250372. eCollection 2025.
2
Evolution of WHO COVID-19 mask guidelines amid intense demands for rapid advice.在对快速建议的强烈需求下，世界卫生组织新冠病毒口罩指南的演变
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 8;4(11):e0003778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003778. eCollection 2024.
3
News Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social Media and the Public's Negative Emotions: Computational Study.社交媒体对 COVID-19 大流行的新闻报道与公众的负面情绪：计算研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 6;26:e48491. doi: 10.2196/48491.
4
Use of qualitative research in World Health Organisation guidelines: a document analysis.定性研究在世界卫生组织指南中的应用：文献分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 4;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01120-y.
5
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion.视网膜静脉阻塞的诊断和管理临床实践指南的系统评价。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jun;38(9):1722-1733. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03008-1. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
6
A systematic review of clinical psychological guidance for perinatal mental health.围产期心理健康的临床心理指导的系统评价
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 30;23(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05173-1.
7
Evidence in decision-making in the context of COVID-19 in Latin America.拉丁美洲新冠疫情背景下决策中的证据
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Oct;14:100322. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100322. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
The tools at our hand to ensure the highest quality, systematicity, transparency and trustworthiness of clinical practice guidelines.我们手中有各种工具来确保临床实践指南的最高质量、系统性、透明度和可信度。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 May;10(4):359-360. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12241. Epub 2022 May 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Academic Journal Retractions and the COVID-19 Pandemic.学术期刊撤稿与新冠疫情
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211015592. doi: 10.1177/21501327211015592.
2
Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research.COVID-19 临床研究的方法学质量。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 11;12(1):943. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21220-5.
3
The COVID-19 infodemic.新冠疫情信息疫情
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):875. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30565-X. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
4
Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what.在紧急情况下使用 GRADE：在 COVID-19 大流行期间，现在比以往任何时候都更重要，无论如何，证据和建议的确定性至关重要。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
5
Assessment of the quality of systematic reviews on COVID-19: A comparative study of previous coronavirus outbreaks.评估 COVID-19 系统评价的质量：对以往冠状病毒爆发的比较研究。
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):883-890. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25901. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
6
A Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT Statement.医疗保健实践指南报告工具：RIGHT 声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jan 17;166(2):128-132. doi: 10.7326/M16-1565. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.GRADE证据到决策（EtD）框架：一种做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。1：引言。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 28;353:i2016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2016.
8
World Health Organization guideline development: an evaluation.世界卫生组织指南制定：评估。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e63715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063715. Print 2013.
9
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care.AGREE II：推进医疗保健领域的指南制定、报告和评估
Prev Med. 2010 Nov;51(5):421-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
10
Going from evidence to recommendations.从证据到建议。
BMJ. 2008 May 10;336(7652):1049-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE.
Zotero 插件