• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The tools at our hand to ensure the highest quality, systematicity, transparency and trustworthiness of clinical practice guidelines.

作者信息

Kantorová Lucia, Klugar Miloslav

机构信息

Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Czech Health Research Council, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 May;10(4):359-360. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12241. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.1002/ueg2.12241
PMID:35524418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9103367/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The tools at our hand to ensure the highest quality, systematicity, transparency and trustworthiness of clinical practice guidelines.我们手中有各种工具来确保临床实践指南的最高质量、系统性、透明度和可信度。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 May;10(4):359-360. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12241. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements in oncology--an assessment of their methodological quality.肿瘤学临床实践指南与共识声明——对其方法学质量的评估
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 17;9(10):e110469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110469. eCollection 2014.
3
Guidelines in cardiac clinical practice: evaluation of their methodological quality using the AGREE II instrument.心脏临床实践指南：使用 AGREE II 工具评估其方法学质量。
J R Soc Med. 2013 Aug;106(8):315-22. doi: 10.1177/0141076813486261. Epub 2013 May 28.
4
Quality assessment of recent evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults using the AGREE II instrument.使用AGREE II工具对近期成人2型糖尿病管理循证临床实践指南进行质量评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):166-172. doi: 10.1111/jep.12785. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
5
Evaluation of the current guidelines for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.运用 AGREE II 工具评价肝细胞癌切除术的现行指南。
J Hepatol. 2017 Nov;67(5):991-998. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Assessment of the Quality of Current American Dental Association Clinical Practice Guidelines.当前美国牙科学会临床实践指南质量评估。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Apr;8(2):178-187. doi: 10.1177/23800844221083563. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
7
AGREE-S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions - United European Gastroenterology and European Association for Endoscopic Surgery methodological guide.AGREE-S：AGREE II 手术干预扩展版 - 联合欧洲胃肠病学和欧洲内镜外科学协会方法学指南。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 May;10(4):425-434. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12231. Epub 2022 May 4.
8
Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.儿科临床实践指南的方法学与报告质量：一项系统综述
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Aug;9(15):1258. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2686.
9
AGREE II assessments of recent acne treatment guidelines: how well do they reveal trustworthiness as defined by the U.S. Institute of Medicine criteria?AGREE II 对近期痤疮治疗指南的评估：它们在多大程度上符合美国医学研究所标准所定义的可信度？
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Dec;177(6):1716-1725. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15777. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
10
Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP), a systematic review of atopic dermatitis clinical practice guidelines: are they clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence based (CUTE)?全球皮肤病学图谱项目（GUIDEMAP）中关于特应性皮炎临床实践指南的系统评价：这些指南是否清晰、无偏倚、可信且基于证据（CUTE）？
Br J Dermatol. 2022 May;186(5):792-802. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20972.

引用本文的文献

1
Young GI angle: European Specialty Examination in Gastroenterology and Hepatology exam: Tips and tricks.青年胃肠角：欧洲胃肠病学和肝病学专业考试：技巧与窍门。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Nov;11(9):907-910. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12480. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
AGREE-S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions - United European Gastroenterology and European Association for Endoscopic Surgery methodological guide.AGREE-S：AGREE II 手术干预扩展版 - 联合欧洲胃肠病学和欧洲内镜外科学协会方法学指南。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 May;10(4):425-434. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12231. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Methodological approaches for developing, reporting, and assessing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: a systematic survey.循证临床实践指南制定、报告和评估的方法学途径：系统调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;146:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.015. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Transparency: A central principle underpinning trustworthy guidelines.透明度：信任准则的核心原则。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:246-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.025. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Visual transformation for guidelines presentation of the strength of recommendations and the certainty of evidence.用于指南中推荐强度和证据确定性呈现的视觉转换。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;143:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
5
Guideline Assessment Project II: statistical calibration informed the development of an AGREE II extension for surgical guidelines.指南评估项目 II：统计校准为外科指南的 AGREE II 扩展开发提供了信息。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4061-4068. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08604-w. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
GRADE notes: How to use GRADE when there is "no" evidence? A case study of the expert evidence approach.GRADE 注释：当没有“证据”时如何使用 GRADE？专家证据方法的案例研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.026. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
7
Consensus and controversy among severe pancreatitis surgery guidelines: a guideline evaluation based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool.重症胰腺炎手术指南中的共识与争议：基于《研究与评价指南评估II》（AGREE II）工具的指南评估
Gland Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):1551-1563. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-444.
8
Guidelines implementation toolbox.指南实施工具箱。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8):984-986. doi: 10.1177/2050640620960289.
9
ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Crohn's Disease: Surgical Treatment.ECCO 指南：克罗恩病治疗——手术治疗。
J Crohns Colitis. 2020 Feb 10;14(2):155-168. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz187.
10
Distinguishing opinion from evidence in guidelines.在指南中区分观点与证据。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 19;366:l4606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4606.