School of Health, Sport and Community, University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester, Hampshire SO22 4NR, UK.
Psychology Department, University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester, Hampshire SO22 4NR, UK.
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105212. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105212. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
Student nurses experience stress leading to poor health and course attrition (Lovegrove, 2018).
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and 'behaviour change techniques' (BCTs) to reduce student nurse stress. BCTs are active components of interventions that are observable, replicable, irreducible and designed to change behaviour (Michie et al., 2013).
Thirteen databases were searched from inception to May 2020.
The interventions were classified according to their target: 'stressors', 'coping', 'cognitive reappraisal' or a combination of these (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984). BCTs were coded using the BCT taxonomy: a hierarchical framework of BCTs (Michie et al., 2013).
28 interventions reported in 23 articles were included in the review. A positive effect was identified in 22 interventions. There were no studies addressing the stressors in isolation and the interventions targeting stressors in combination with coping (n = 1) or cognitive reappraisal (n = 1) found no significant effects. In contrast, 74% of those targeting coping alone (n = 14/19), 100% of those addressing coping and cognitive reappraisal together (n = 4/4) and 66% addressing all three targets together (n = 2/3) were successful. The most common BCTs provided students with information and skills relating to stress management, with 18/21 being successful >50% of the time.
Overall, most interventions aimed to teach students skills to cope with stress, with the majority having a short-term effect. However, as some interventions and BCTs were infrequently used or poorly described and all studies had a medium-high risk of bias, there is a need for longitudinal high-quality studies.
学生护士承受压力,导致健康状况不佳和课程流失(Lovegrove,2018)。
本系统评价旨在评估干预措施和“行为改变技术”(BCTs)的有效性,以减少护生压力。BCTs 是干预措施的有效组成部分,可观察、可复制、不可简化,旨在改变行为(Michie 等人,2013)。
从开始到 2020 年 5 月,共检索了 13 个数据库。
根据干预措施的目标对其进行分类:“压力源”、“应对”、“认知重评”或这些目标的组合(Lazarus 和 Folkman,1984)。使用 BCT 分类法对 BCT 进行编码:BCT 的层次框架(Michie 等人,2013)。
共纳入 23 篇文章中报道的 28 项干预措施。22 项干预措施有积极效果。没有研究单独针对压力源,针对压力源与应对(n=1)或认知重评(n=1)相结合的干预措施没有发现显著效果。相比之下,单独针对应对的干预措施中,有 74%(n=14/19)、同时针对应对和认知重评的干预措施中,有 100%(n=4/4)、同时针对所有三个目标的干预措施中,有 66%(n=2/3)有效果。最常见的 BCT 是向学生提供与压力管理相关的信息和技能,其中 18/21 有 50%以上的成功率。
总体而言,大多数干预措施旨在教授学生应对压力的技能,大多数干预措施有短期效果。然而,由于一些干预措施和 BCTs 使用频率较低或描述较差,且所有研究的偏倚风险均较高,因此需要进行长期高质量的研究。