Evaluation of clinical parameters for the stability of 2 types of miniscrews.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this research was to compare insertion techniques and effects on mechanical and clinical parameters between 2 types of miniscrews.

METHODS

Forty-four consecutive patients whose orthodontic treatment involved the use of miniscrews (miniscrew A [MA] and miniscrew B [MB]) for anchorage were included in this study. Miniscrews were placed with predrilling or self-drilling; peak maximum insertion torque (MIT) and Periotest values were measured. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed after the insertion of miniscrews and root proximity determination; cortical bone thickness was also analyzed. Periotest values were measured after the application of orthodontic force.

RESULTS

Self-drilling produced higher Periotest values (P <0.01) for MA and higher MIT (P <0.01) for MB with closer root proximity (P <0.05). MB had higher MIT and Periotest values with drilling compared with MA (P <0.05); MB also showed closer root proximity (P <0.05). Successful miniscrews had lower MIT (P <0.05) for MB and lower Periotest values (P <0.01) for both MA and MB, with significantly more distant root proximity (P <0.01). Self-drilling produced higher Periotest values at the time of placement (P <0.01) and after 4 weeks (P <0.05) in MA. Drilling produced higher Periotest values for MB at the time of placement (P <0.05). MIT had positive correlations with Periotest values for MB with self-drilling (P <0.01) and with root proximity for MA with drilling (P <0.01). Periotest values had negative correlations with root proximity for MA and the MB group with drilling (P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For miniscrews with larger diameters, higher MIT may result in more mobility (higher Periotest values). Drilling can avoid root contact and enhance primary stability, thus producing lower Periotest values.