Nafees Asaad Ahmed, Muneer Muhammad Zia, De Matteis Sara, Amaral Andre, Burney Peter, Cullinan Paul
Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Apr;79(4):242-244. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107680. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Byssinosis remains a significant problem among textile workers in low/middle-income countries. Here we share our experience of using different prediction equations for assessing 'chronic' byssinosis according to the standard WHO classification using measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV).
We enrolled 1910 workers in a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to improve the health of textile workers in Pakistan. We included in analyses the 1724 (90%) men who performed pre-bronchodilator spirometry tests of acceptable quality. We compared four different equations for deriving lung function percentage predicted values among those with symptoms-based byssinosis: the third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III, with 'North Indian and Pakistani' conversion factor); the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI, 'other or mixed ethnicities'); a recent equation derived from survey of a western Indian population; and one based on an older and smaller survey of Karachi residents.
58 men (3.4%) had symptoms-based byssinosis according to WHO criteria. Of these, the proportions with a reduced FEV (<80% predicted) identified using NHANES and GLI; Indian and Pakistani reference equations were 40%, 41%, 14% and 12%, respectively. Much of this variation was eliminated when we substituted FEV/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (<lower limit of normality) as a measure of airway obstruction.
Accurate measures of occupational disease frequency and distribution require approaches that are both standardised and meaningful. We should reconsider the WHO definition of 'chronic' byssinosis based on changes in FEV, and instead use the FEV/FVC.
在低收入/中等收入国家,棉尘病仍是纺织工人面临的一个重大问题。在此,我们分享根据世界卫生组织(WHO)标准分类,使用1秒用力呼气量(FEV)测量值,运用不同预测方程评估“慢性”棉尘病的经验。
我们招募了1910名工人参与一项旨在改善巴基斯坦纺织工人健康状况的干预措施随机对照试验。我们将1724名(90%)进行了质量合格的支气管扩张剂使用前肺量计测试的男性纳入分析。我们比较了四种不同的方程,用于推导有基于症状的棉尘病患者的预测肺功能百分比值:第三次美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES - III,采用“北印度和巴基斯坦”转换因子);全球肺功能倡议(GLI,“其他或混合种族”);一个近期从印度西部人群调查得出的方程;以及一个基于对卡拉奇居民进行的一项规模较小且年代较久的调查得出的方程。
根据WHO标准,58名男性(3.4%)患有基于症状的棉尘病。其中,使用NHANES和GLI、印度和巴基斯坦参考方程确定的FEV降低(<预测值的80%)的比例分别为40%、41%、14%和12%。当我们用FEV/用力肺活量(FVC)比值(<正常下限)作为气道阻塞的指标时,这种差异大部分被消除。
准确测量职业病的频率和分布需要标准化且有意义的方法。我们应基于FEV的变化重新考虑WHO对“慢性”棉尘病的定义,而应改用FEV/FVC。