• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微视野计、标准自动视野计和频域光学相干断层扫描在评估伴有半视野缺损的青光眼患者黄斑区中的比较

A Comparison Among Microperimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of the Macula in Glaucoma Eyes with Hemifield Defects.

作者信息

Tian Tian, Cai Yu, Li Mei, Fang Yuan, Pan Yingzi

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Feb;11(1):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00423-5. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1007/s40123-021-00423-5
PMID:34800261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8770759/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the correlation between macular integrity assessment (MAIA) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) in detecting macular function damage in glaucoma and to explore the relationship between macular structure and functional damage by using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Seventy patients with glaucoma, with hemifield defects verified by Humphrey 24-2 examination, and 60 normal subjects underwent Humphrey 10-2 and MAIA expert 10-2 examinations. Patients with glaucoma with normal hemifields, as detected by SAP, were divided into a normal hemifield group and a visual field (VF) defect group. The difference in the retina and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thicknesses was analyzed between the abnormal and normal hemifields.

RESULTS

Among the 70 glaucoma eyes, the results of MAIA and SAP were consistent for 66 (66/70, 94.3%). The others showed SAP hemifield defects, while MAIA was normal (4/70, 5.7%). There was a good correlation of the mean sensitivity between MAIA and SAP (P < 0.001). There also was a good correlation between the mean threshold of MAIA and the mean deviation (MD) of SAP (P = 0.008, r = 0.507). Among the patients with glaucoma with a normal hemifield, MAIA showed abnormal results in 50 eyes (50/66, 75.8%), which was consistent with the changes in the inner retina and GCC thicknesses. Meanwhile, MAIA showed normal results; there were no significant differences between patients with glaucoma and the normal group in the thicknesses of the inner retina and GCC.

CONCLUSION

MAIA and SAP have good consistency in detecting macular dysfunction. MAIA can also identify abnormal VFs in the macular regions that may not be detected by SAP, which is consistent with the changes in the GCC thicknesses, suggesting that there may be central VF damage in patients with glaucoma that has not been previously identified.

摘要

引言

评估黄斑完整性评估(MAIA)与标准自动视野计(SAP)在检测青光眼黄斑功能损害方面的相关性,并利用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)探讨黄斑结构与功能损害之间的关系。

方法

这是一项横断面研究。70例经Humphrey 24-2检查证实有半视野缺损的青光眼患者和60例正常受试者接受了Humphrey 10-2和MAIA专家10-2检查。经SAP检测,视野正常的青光眼患者被分为正常半视野组和视野(VF)缺损组。分析异常和正常半视野之间视网膜和神经节细胞复合体(GCC)厚度的差异。

结果

在70只青光眼眼中,MAIA和SAP结果一致的有66只(66/70,94.3%)。其他显示SAP半视野缺损,而MAIA正常(4/70,5.7%)。MAIA与SAP之间的平均敏感度有良好相关性(P < 0.001)。MAIA的平均阈值与SAP的平均偏差(MD)之间也有良好相关性(P = 0.008,r = 0.507)。在视野正常的青光眼患者中,MAIA在50只眼中显示异常结果(50/66,75.8%),这与视网膜内层和GCC厚度的变化一致。同时,MAIA显示正常结果;青光眼患者与正常组在内层视网膜和GCC厚度上无显著差异。

结论

MAIA和SAP在检测黄斑功能障碍方面具有良好的一致性。MAIA还可以识别SAP可能未检测到的黄斑区域异常视野,这与GCC厚度的变化一致,表明青光眼患者可能存在先前未被识别的中央视野损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/354726dc6cab/40123_2021_423_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/17f7a647ccb6/40123_2021_423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/475f81899249/40123_2021_423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/6f5b3a3fcc6c/40123_2021_423_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/354726dc6cab/40123_2021_423_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/17f7a647ccb6/40123_2021_423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/475f81899249/40123_2021_423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/6f5b3a3fcc6c/40123_2021_423_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569f/8770759/354726dc6cab/40123_2021_423_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison Among Microperimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of the Macula in Glaucoma Eyes with Hemifield Defects.微视野计、标准自动视野计和频域光学相干断层扫描在评估伴有半视野缺损的青光眼患者黄斑区中的比较
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Feb;11(1):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00423-5. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
2
Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.初诊黄斑损伤的青光眼患者视野检查:频域加倍技术与 24-2 或 10-2 视野标准自动视野计的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2018 Jul;27(7):627-634. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000977.
3
A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.青光眼旁中心视野缺损眼的微视野与标准灰阶视野检查的比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;94(1):64-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.159772. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
Diagnostic Consistency and Relation Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Automated Perimetry in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼患者中光学相干断层扫描与标准自动视野计之间的诊断一致性及关系
Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(2):185-190. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2015.1046557. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Correlation of Macular Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness With Frequency-doubling Technology Perimetry in Open-angle Glaucoma With Hemifield Defects.开角型青光眼伴半视野缺损患者黄斑神经节细胞复合体厚度与倍频技术视野检查的相关性
J Glaucoma. 2016 May;25(5):426-32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000281.
6
[Retinal vessel density in primary open-angle glaucoma with a hemifield defect].[原发性开角型青光眼伴半视野缺损的视网膜血管密度]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 11;57(3):201-206. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20201102-00734.
7
Macular symmetry testing for glaucoma detection.用于青光眼检测的黄斑对称性测试。
J Glaucoma. 2005 Oct;14(5):358-63. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000176930.21853.04.
8
Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.倍频技术视野检查法在伴有半视野缺损的开角型青光眼眼中的应用:高眼压组与正常眼压组的比较
J Glaucoma. 2007 Jan;16(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000243478.90403.84.
9
Virtual Reality Oculokinetic Perimetry Test Reproducibility and Relationship to Conventional Perimetry and OCT.虚拟现实眼球运动视野测试的可重复性及其与传统视野检查和光学相干断层扫描的关系。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2021 Dec 21;2(1):100105. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100105. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.在半视野中存在弥漫性青光眼性结构和功能损害,但无明显的模式丧失。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;127(11):1442-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.196.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of changes in retinal light sensitivity thresholds in the early postoperative days after trabeculectomy using microperimetry.使用微视野计评估小梁切除术后早期视网膜光敏感度阈值的变化。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 May;69(3):432-441. doi: 10.1007/s10384-025-01186-3. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
MAIA and Humphrey Perimetry Differ in Their Estimation of Homonymous Visual Field Defects.MAIA 和 Humphrey 视野计在估计同形同像视野缺损方面存在差异。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 4;13(11):15. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.15.
3
MP-3 microperimeter in early primary open angle glaucoma with a new pattern.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional evaluation of the macular area in early glaucoma using microperimetry.利用微视野计对早期青光眼的黄斑区进行功能评估。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;69(4):876-881. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1199_20.
2
Circumpapillary structure-function relationships with microperimetry and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma: a pilot study.青光眼患者视乳头周围结构与功能关系的微视野检查及频域光学相干断层扫描研究:一项初步研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 6;12:2535-2544. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S186739. eCollection 2018.
3
Can Macula and Optic Nerve Head Parameters Detect Glaucoma Progression in Eyes with Advanced Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage?
新型模式下的MP-3微视野计在早期原发性开角型青光眼中的应用
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 18;17(5):861-868. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.05.10. eCollection 2024.
4
Trends in research related to ophthalmic microperimetry from 1992 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge graph study.1992年至2022年眼科微视野计相关研究趋势:文献计量分析与知识图谱研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 19;9:1024336. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1024336. eCollection 2022.
黄斑和视神经头参数能否检测到有广泛的环周视网膜神经纤维层损伤的眼中青光眼的进展?
Ophthalmology. 2018 Dec;125(12):1907-1912. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Patterns of Progressive Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thinning in Glaucoma Detected by OCT.OCT 检测到的青光眼进展性节细胞-内丛状层变薄模式。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1515-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.052. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
5
Integrating Macular Ganglion Cell Inner Plexiform Layer and Parapapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements to Detect Glaucoma Progression.整合黄斑神经节细胞内丛状层和视盘旁视网膜神经纤维层测量值以检测青光眼进展。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jun;125(6):822-831. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
6
Circumpapillary ganglion cell complex thickness to diagnose glaucoma: A pilot study.视乳头周围神经节细胞复合体厚度用于诊断青光眼:一项初步研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;65(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_437_16.
7
Structural and functional assessment of macula to diagnose glaucoma.用于诊断青光眼的黄斑结构和功能评估。
Eye (Lond). 2017 Apr;31(4):593-600. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.277. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
8
Fascicular Visual Field Defects in Open-Angle Glaucoma: Evaluation with Microperimetry.开角型青光眼的束状视野缺损:微视野计评估
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:8274954. doi: 10.1155/2016/8274954. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
9
Microperimetric Assessment after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: 4-Year Follow-Up.视网膜前膜手术后的微视野评估:4年随访
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:7030791. doi: 10.1155/2016/7030791. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
10
Comparison of Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA ™), MP-3, and the Humphrey Field Analyzer in the Evaluation of the Relationship between the Structure and Function of the Macula.黄斑完整性评估(MAIA™)、MP-3与Humphrey视野分析仪在评估黄斑结构与功能关系中的比较。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151000. eCollection 2016.