Suppr超能文献

恢复期血浆治疗与 COVID-19 患者死亡率的关系:一项针对随机临床试验的协作系统评价和荟萃分析。

Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Department for Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):1170. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06829-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX ).

METHODS

In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3% of the weight in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Convalescent plasma treatment of patients with COVID-19 did not reduce all-cause mortality. These results provide strong evidence that convalescent plasma treatment for patients with COVID-19 should not be used outside of randomized trials. Evidence synthesis from collaborations among trial investigators can inform both evidence generation and evidence application in patient care.

摘要

背景

恢复期血浆已被广泛用于治疗 COVID-19,并在众多随机临床试验中进行了研究,但目前仅公开了少数试验的结果。本研究旨在评估恢复期血浆治疗与安慰剂或无治疗相比,对 COVID-19 患者的益处,使用所有可用的随机临床试验的数据,包括未发表和正在进行的试验(Open Science Framework,https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX)。

方法

在这项协作性系统评价和荟萃分析中,检索了临床试验注册库(ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台)、Cochrane COVID-19 注册库、LOVE 数据库和 PubMed,直到 2021 年 4 月 8 日。通过电子邮件联系了在 2021 年 3 月 1 日之前注册、尚无发表结果的试验的研究者。合格的试验为正在进行、已停止和已完成的随机临床试验,比较了恢复期血浆与安慰剂或无治疗在 COVID-19 患者中的疗效,无论设置或治疗方案如何。从出版物中提取或由未发表试验的研究者提供汇总死亡率数据,并使用 Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman 随机效应模型进行合并。我们研究了未发表试验对总体证据的贡献。

结果

共有 16477 名患者纳入 33 项试验(20 项未发表试验中有 3190 名患者,13 项发表试验中有 13287 名患者)。32 项试验仅纳入住院患者(其中 3 项仅纳入重症监护病房患者)。33 项试验中,29 项试验的偏倚风险较低。在接受恢复期血浆治疗的 8495 名患者中,有 1997 人死亡(23%),在接受对照组治疗的 7982 名患者中,有 1952 人死亡(24%)。全因死亡率的合并风险比为 0.97(95%置信区间:0.92;1.02),且各研究间异质性在可接受范围内(I=0%)。RECOVERY 试验和未发表的证据分别占荟萃分析权重的 69.8%和 25.3%。

结论

恢复期血浆治疗 COVID-19 患者并未降低全因死亡率。这些结果提供了有力的证据,表明 COVID-19 患者不应在随机试验之外使用恢复期血浆治疗。来自试验研究者之间合作的证据综合可以为证据生成和患者护理中的证据应用提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ede/8605509/c73fc95409b5/12879_2021_6829_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验