Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):683-702. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.040. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
We reviewed the individual participant data of patients who sustained isolated common peroneal nerve (CPN) injuries resulting in foot drop. Functional results were compared between eight interventions for CPN palsies to determine step-wise treatment approaches for the underlying mechanisms of nerve injury.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched. PRISMA-IPD and Cochrane guidelines were followed in the data search. Eligible patients sustained isolated CPN injuries resulting in their foot drop. Patients were stratified by mechanisms of nerve injury, ages, duration of motor symptoms, and nerve defect/zone of injury sizes, and were compared by functional results (poor = 0, fair = 1, good = 2, excellent = 3), using meta-regression between interventions. Interventions evaluated were primary neurorrhaphy, neurolysis, nerve grafts, partial nerve transfer, neuromusculotendinous transfer, tendon transfer, ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), and arthrodesis.
One hundred and forty-four studies included 1284 patients published from 1985 through 2020. Transection/Cut: Excellent functional results following tendon transfer (OR: 126, 95%CI: 6.9, 2279.7, p=0.001), compared to AFO. Rupture/Avulsion: Excellent functional results following tendon transfer (OR: 73985359, 95%CI: 73985359, 73985359, p<0.001), nerve graft (OR: 4465917, 95%CI: 1288542, 15478276, p<0.001), and neuromusculotendinous transfer (OR: 42277348, 95%CI: 3001397, 595514030, p<0.001), compared to AFO. Traction/Stretch: Good functional results following tendon transfer (OR: 4.1, 95%CI: 1.17, 14.38, p=0.028), compared to AFO. Entrapment: Excellent functional results following neurolysis (OR: 4.6, 95%CI: 1.3, 16.6, p=0.019), compared to AFO.
Functional results may be optimized for treatments by the mechanism of nerve injury. Transection/Cut and Traction/Stretch had the best functional results following tendon transfer. Rupture/Avulsion had the best functional results following tendon transfer, nerve graft, or neuromusculotendinous transfer. Entrapment had the best functional results following neurolysis.
我们回顾了因单纯腓总神经(CPN)损伤导致足下垂的患者的个体参与者数据。通过比较 8 种治疗腓总神经麻痹的干预措施的功能结果,确定了针对神经损伤机制的逐步治疗方法。
检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、Scopus 和 CINAHL 数据库。按照 PRISMA-IPD 和 Cochrane 指南进行数据检索。符合条件的患者均为单纯腓总神经损伤导致足下垂。根据神经损伤机制、年龄、运动症状持续时间以及神经缺损/损伤区域大小对患者进行分层,并通过功能结果(差=0、一般=1、良好=2、优秀=3)进行比较,采用干预措施之间的元回归。评估的干预措施包括:神经直接吻合术、神经松解术、神经移植、部分神经转移术、肌神经肌腱转移术、肌腱转移术、踝足矫形器(AFO)和关节融合术。
共有 144 项研究纳入了 1284 名患者,这些研究发表于 1985 年至 2020 年。切割/切断:肌腱转移术后的优秀功能结果(OR:126,95%CI:6.9,2279.7,p=0.001),与 AFO 相比。断裂/撕脱:肌腱转移术后的优秀功能结果(OR:73985359,95%CI:73985359,73985359,p<0.001),神经移植(OR:4465917,95%CI:1288542,15478276,p<0.001),肌神经肌腱转移术(OR:42277348,95%CI:3001397,595514030,p<0.001),与 AFO 相比。牵拉/伸展:肌腱转移术后的良好功能结果(OR:4.1,95%CI:1.17,14.38,p=0.028),与 AFO 相比。压迫:神经松解术后的优秀功能结果(OR:4.6,95%CI:1.3,16.6,p=0.019),与 AFO 相比。
治疗效果可能因神经损伤机制而异。切割/切断时,肌腱转移术的治疗效果最佳;牵拉/伸展时,肌腱转移术的治疗效果最佳;断裂/撕脱时,肌腱转移术、神经移植术或肌神经肌腱转移术的治疗效果最佳;压迫时,神经松解术的治疗效果最佳。