National Centre for Early Prevention, German Youth Institute, Department of Families and Family Policies, Munich, Germany.
National Centre for Early Prevention, German Youth Institute, Department of Families and Family Policies, Munich, Germany.
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jan;123:105373. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105373. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Family violence, especially child maltreatment and intimate partner violence, in early childhood has a strong impact on negative developmental outcomes. There is evidence of child, parental, and family risk factors. Less is known about paternal than maternal risk factors.
To identify maternal and paternal predictors of family violence and predictive constellations of risk factors.
According to psychosocial adversity in a larger study, families were stratified into low-, medium- and high-risk groups. Both, mothers and fathers (n = 197/191), were investigated longitudinally across seven months using self-report questionnaires and ratings of the IFEEL Pictures.
χ-tests, logistic regression models, and prediction configural frequency analysis (P-CFA) were employed.
Univariate predictors (p < .05) were anxiety and stress in mothers, and insensitivity in recognizing negative child emotions in fathers. Within high-risk levels, paternal adverse childhood experiences (ACE) were a predictor (z = 2.92, p > .01), proven by P-CFA. Logistic regression models including family violence at baseline, sociodemographic variables, univariate predictors, and ACE of both parents revealed maternal anxiety (OR = 1.22, p < .05) and low paternal recognition of negative IFEEL Pictures (OR = 6.00, p < .05) as predictors. P-CFA identified socioemotional problems in children and low paternal recognition of negative child emotions as a predictive risk constellation (z = 2.58, p > .01).
Analysis of both caregivers in small population samples with oversampled at-risk families leads to a systemic perspective of family violence. The identified risk constellation is highly relevant for early childhood intervention.
儿童期早期的家庭暴力,特别是儿童虐待和亲密伴侣暴力,对负面发展结果有强烈影响。有证据表明存在儿童、父母和家庭风险因素。相比之下,人们对父亲的风险因素知之甚少。
确定母亲和父亲与家庭暴力相关的预测因素,以及风险因素的预测组合。
根据一项较大研究中的心理社会逆境,将家庭分为低、中、高风险组。使用自我报告问卷和 IFEEL 图片评定,对 197 名母亲和 191 名父亲进行了为期七个月的纵向调查。
采用 χ 检验、逻辑回归模型和预测配置频率分析(P-CFA)。
单变量预测因素(p <.05)为母亲的焦虑和压力,以及父亲识别孩子消极情绪的不敏感。在高风险水平内,父亲的不良童年经历(ACE)是一个预测因素(z = 2.92,p >.01),这一结果通过 P-CFA 得到证实。包含基线家庭暴力、社会人口学变量、单变量预测因素以及父母 ACE 的逻辑回归模型显示,母亲的焦虑(OR = 1.22,p <.05)和父亲对 IFEEL 图片的消极情绪识别能力较低(OR = 6.00,p <.05)是预测因素。P-CFA 确定了儿童的社会情感问题和父亲对孩子消极情绪的识别能力较低是一个具有预测性的风险组合(z = 2.58,p >.01)。
对小样本人口和高危家庭进行了双亲分析,得出了一个系统的家庭暴力视角。确定的风险组合对儿童早期干预具有重要意义。