Suppr超能文献

影响商业卵子库供卵者与项目供卵者活产率的因素:2016-2018 年美国生殖医学学会注册登记系统 40485 个周期分析。

Factors affecting live birth rates in donor oocytes from commercial egg banks vs. program egg donors: an analysis of 40,485 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry in 2016-2018.

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2022 Feb;117(2):339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the differences in live birth rates (LBRs), with single embryo transfer (SET), using oocytes from program generated egg donors vs. commercial egg bank donors and other factors affecting LBRs using donor oocytes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): A total of 40,485 in vitro fertilization cycles using donor oocytes reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry in 2016-2018.

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate and cumulative LBR for SET using donor oocytes.

RESULT(S): Multivariate results from the first SET from 19,128 cycles, including 15,429 from program generated egg donors and 3,699 from commercial egg banks, showed, when controlling for all other variables, the following: the LBR in the first SET cycle using commercial egg banks was 53.3% compared with 55.4% using program recruited egg donors (odds ratio [OR], 0.92); a reduction in the LBR with increasing recipient age, ages 40-44 years (OR, 0.80), 45-49 years (OR, 0.77), and >49 years (OR, 0.65); a steady decline in the LBR with increases in recipient body mass index above normal; and a steady increase in the LBR in association with >16 oocytes retrieved. Double embryo transfer increased the LBR (SET, 52%, vs. double embryo transfer, 58%) but also significantly increased the multiple pregnancy LBR, with 43% twins and 0.9% triplets. Blastocyst transfer had a higher LBR than cleavage stage embryos (52.5% vs. 39.5%). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs. conventional insemination when using fresh oocytes from program donors had similar LBRs.

CONCLUSION(S): When performing in vitro fertilization using donor oocytes with SET, the LBR is affected by oocyte source, recipient age, recipient body mass index, stage of embryo at transfer, and number of oocytes retrieved.

摘要

目的

检查使用来自项目生成的卵子供体的卵子与商业卵子库供体的卵子进行单胚胎移植(SET)的活产率(LBR)差异,以及其他影响使用捐赠卵子的 LBR 的因素。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

不适用。

患者

2016-2018 年向辅助生殖技术协会注册处报告的共 40485 个体外受精周期使用捐赠卵子。

干预

无。

主要观察指标

使用捐赠卵子进行 SET 的活产率和累积 LBR。

结果

从 19128 个周期的第一次 SET 中进行多变量分析,包括 15429 个来自项目生成的卵子供体和 3699 个来自商业卵子库的卵子,在控制所有其他变量的情况下,结果如下:使用商业卵子库的第一次 SET 周期的 LBR 为 53.3%,而使用项目招募的卵子供体的 LBR 为 55.4%(优势比[OR],0.92);随着受体年龄的增加,LBR 降低,40-44 岁(OR,0.80),45-49 岁(OR,0.77)和>49 岁(OR,0.65);受体体重指数高于正常水平时,LBR 呈稳步下降;与>16 个卵母细胞回收相关的 LBR 呈稳步增加。双胚胎移植增加了 LBR(SET,52%,vs. 双胚胎移植,58%),但也显著增加了多胎妊娠的 LBR,双胞胎率为 43%,三胞胎率为 0.9%。囊胚移植的活产率高于卵裂期胚胎(52.5% vs. 39.5%)。当使用项目供体的新鲜卵子进行体外受精时,胞浆内精子注射与常规授精的 LBR 相似。

结论

在使用 SET 进行体外受精时,使用来自项目的卵子捐赠者的卵子的 LBR 受卵子来源、受体年龄、受体体重指数、胚胎转移阶段和卵母细胞回收数量的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验