Variability associated with mandibular ramus area thickness and depth in subjects with different growth patterns, gender, and growth status.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the ramus bone parameters (ramus thickness and ramus depth) for miniscrew placement. An additional aim was to compare and contrast the ramus bone parameters in growing and nongrowing male and female subjects with hyperdivergent, normodivergent, hypodivergent facial types.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 690 subjects were evaluated. They were classified in terms of growth status, gender, and facial type. Ramus thickness was measured as the distance from the outer (buccal) to the inner (lingual) aspects of the mandibular ramus. Ramus depth was measured as the distance from the anterior border of the ramus to the inferior alveolar nerve canal. The measurements for ramus thickness and ramus depth were performed at 3 different levels bilaterally: (1) occlusal plane (OP), (2) 5 mm above the occlusal plane (5OP), and (3) 10 mm above the occlusal plane (10OP).

RESULTS

Males showed a significantly higher ramus thickness than females (P <0.05). Ramus thickness decreased significantly (P <0.05) as we moved superior from the level of OP to 5OP and 10OP in all 3 facial types in both females (growing and nongrowing) and males (growing and nongrowing). Growing females and growing males had significantly higher ramus thickness than nongrowing females and nongrowing males, respectively. Ramus depth increased as we moved higher from the OP to 10OP. Hyperdivergent facial type showed a significantly reduced ramus depth compared with hypodivergent and normodivergent facial type in growing and nongrowing males and females at all 3 locations, namely OP, 5OP, and 10OP (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of adequate ramus depth and ramus thickness, 5OP was considered the optimal insertion site for the placement of miniscrews. Patients with a hyperdivergent facial type showed significantly reduced ramus depth than hypodivergent and normodivergent facial types. Ramus thickness in males was significantly higher than in females in all facial types.