Saner Halit Serdar, Yucesan Melih, Gul Muhammet
Department of Engineering Management, Munzur University, 62000 Tunceli, Turkey.
Department of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Munzur University, 62000 Tunceli, Turkey.
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;111(2):1603-1635. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-05108-7. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
Hospitals are the first point of contact for people in the face of disasters that interfere with the daily functioning of life and endanger health and social life. All preparations should be made considering the worst possible conditions and the provided service should continue without interruption. In this study, a multi-criteria decision-making model was developed to evaluate disaster preparedness of hospitals. This decision model includes Bayesian best-worst method (BBWM), the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods. With the proposed decision model, six main criteria and 34 sub-criteria related to disaster preparedness of hospitals were considered. The criteria and sub-criteria evaluated in pairwise comparison manner by the experts were weighted with BBWM. These weight values and the data obtained from the six Turkish hospitals were combined to provide inputs for VIKOR and TOPSIS. In addition, a comparative study and sensitivity analysis were carried out using weight vectors obtained by different tools. BBWM application results show that the "Personnel" criterion was determined as the most important criterion with an importance value of 26%. This criterion is followed by "Equipment" with 25%, "Transportation" with 14%, "Hospital building" and "Communication" with 12%, and "Flexibility" with 11%. Hospital-2 was determined as the most prepared hospital for disasters as a result of VIKOR application. The VIKOR Q value of this hospital was obtained as 0.000. According to the results of the comparative study, Hospital-2 was determined as the most disaster-ready hospital in all six different scenarios. This hospital is followed by Hospital-4 (Q = 0.5661) and Hospital-5 (Q = 0.7464). The remaining rankings were Hospital-6, Hospital-3 and Hospital-1. The solidity of the results was checked with TOPSIS. Based on TOPSIS application results, Hospital-2 was again found the most-ready hospital. The usage of BBWM in this study enabled the expert group's views to be combined without loss of information and to determine the criteria and sub-criteria weights with less pairwise comparisons in a probabilistic perspective. Via the "Credal ranking", which is the contribution of BBWM to the literature, the interpretation of the hierarchy between each criterion has been performed more precisely.
面对干扰日常生活功能、危及健康和社会生活的灾难时,医院是人们的首要接触点。所有准备工作都应考虑到最糟糕的情况,且所提供的服务应持续不间断。在本研究中,开发了一种多标准决策模型来评估医院的灾难准备情况。该决策模型包括贝叶斯最佳 - 最差方法(BBWM)、VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje(VIKOR)以及与理想解相似的序贯偏好技术(TOPSIS)方法。利用所提出的决策模型,考虑了与医院灾难准备相关的六个主要标准和34个子标准。专家以成对比较的方式评估的标准和子标准通过BBWM进行加权。这些权重值与从六家土耳其医院获得的数据相结合,为VIKOR和TOPSIS提供输入。此外,使用不同工具获得的权重向量进行了比较研究和敏感性分析。BBWM的应用结果表明,“人员”标准被确定为最重要的标准,重要性值为26%。其次是“设备”,占25%,“交通”占14%,“医院建筑”和“通信”各占12%,“灵活性”占11%。由于VIKOR的应用,医院2被确定为灾难准备最充分的医院。该医院的VIKOR Q值为0.000。根据比较研究的结果,在所有六种不同情况下,医院2被确定为最具灾难应对能力的医院。其次是医院4(Q = 0.5661)和医院5(Q = 0.7464)。其余排名依次为医院6、医院3和医院1。通过TOPSIS检验了结果的可靠性。基于TOPSIS的应用结果,再次发现医院2是准备最充分的医院。本研究中BBWM的使用使得专家组的意见能够在不损失信息的情况下合并,并从概率角度通过较少的成对比较来确定标准和子标准的权重。通过BBWM对文献的贡献“Credal排名”,更精确地对每个标准之间的层次结构进行了解释。