• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国关于人工智能与伦理的网络公共话语:背景、内容及影响

Online public discourse on artificial intelligence and ethics in China: context, content, and implications.

作者信息

Mao Yishu, Shi-Kupfer Kristin

机构信息

Lise Meitner Research Group "China in the Global System of Science", Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany.

Contemporary China Studies, Universität Trier, Trier, Germany.

出版信息

AI Soc. 2023;38(1):373-389. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01309-7. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00146-021-01309-7
PMID:34803237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8594647/
Abstract

The societal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked discussions among academics, policymakers and the public around the world. What has gone unnoticed so far are the likewise vibrant discussions in China. We analyzed a large sample of discussions about AI ethics on two Chinese social media platforms. Findings suggest that participants were diverse, and included scholars, IT industry actors, journalists, and members of the general public. They addressed a broad range of concerns associated with the application of AI in various fields. Some even gave recommendations on how to tackle these issues. We argue that these discussions are a valuable source for understanding the future trajectory of AI development in China as well as implications for global dialogue on AI governance.

摘要

人工智能(AI)的社会和伦理影响引发了全球学术界、政策制定者和公众的讨论。迄今为止未被注意到的是,中国也有同样热烈的讨论。我们分析了两个中国社交媒体平台上关于人工智能伦理的大量讨论样本。研究结果表明,参与者多种多样,包括学者、信息技术行业从业者、记者和普通公众。他们讨论了与人工智能在各个领域应用相关的广泛问题。有些人甚至就如何解决这些问题提出了建议。我们认为,这些讨论是了解中国人工智能发展未来轨迹以及对全球人工智能治理对话影响的宝贵资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/b9541305ce78/146_2021_1309_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/fbe0360b59ea/146_2021_1309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/d2145bf3f1dd/146_2021_1309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/307139c9c322/146_2021_1309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/1c433a2ad0e9/146_2021_1309_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/1aea063942a7/146_2021_1309_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/b9541305ce78/146_2021_1309_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/fbe0360b59ea/146_2021_1309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/d2145bf3f1dd/146_2021_1309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/307139c9c322/146_2021_1309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/1c433a2ad0e9/146_2021_1309_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/1aea063942a7/146_2021_1309_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/8594647/b9541305ce78/146_2021_1309_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Online public discourse on artificial intelligence and ethics in China: context, content, and implications.中国关于人工智能与伦理的网络公共话语:背景、内容及影响
AI Soc. 2023;38(1):373-389. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01309-7. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
2
Research ethics and artificial intelligence for global health: perspectives from the global forum on bioethics in research.研究伦理与全球健康中的人工智能:来自全球研究生物伦理论坛的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Apr 18;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01044-w.
3
AI ethics with Chinese characteristics? Concerns and preferred solutions in Chinese academia.具有中国特色的人工智能伦理?中国学术界的担忧与首选解决方案
AI Soc. 2022 Oct 17:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01578-w.
4
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.您的机器人治疗师现在为您服务:具身人工智能在精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的伦理意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 9;21(5):e13216. doi: 10.2196/13216.
5
Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Population Health and the Public's Role in Its Governance: Perspectives From a Citizen and Expert Panel.人工智能在人口健康中的伦理影响及公众在其治理中的作用:来自公民和专家小组的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 27;25:e44357. doi: 10.2196/44357.
6
Reporting of screening and diagnostic AI rarely acknowledges ethical, legal, and social implications: a mass media frame analysis.报告筛选和诊断 AI 很少承认伦理、法律和社会影响:大众媒体框架分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01353-1.
7
Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics.谁来负责?通过信任和道德视角看美国公众对人工智能治理的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jul;33(5):654-672. doi: 10.1177/09636625231224592. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.促进健康的人工智能:伦理文献的范围综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8.
9
The relationship between personal and professional goals and emotional state in academia: a study on unethical use of artificial intelligence.学术界个人目标与职业目标和情绪状态之间的关系:一项关于人工智能不道德使用的研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 27;15:1363174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363174. eCollection 2024.
10
Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care: Content Analysis of Social Media.公众对医疗人工智能的看法:社交媒体的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 13;22(7):e16649. doi: 10.2196/16649.

引用本文的文献

1
AI Through Ethical Lenses: A Discourse Analysis of Guidelines for AI in Healthcare.人工智能的伦理视角:医疗保健中人工智能指南的话语分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 4;30(3):24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00486-0.
2
AI ethics with Chinese characteristics? Concerns and preferred solutions in Chinese academia.具有中国特色的人工智能伦理?中国学术界的担忧与首选解决方案
AI Soc. 2022 Oct 17:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01578-w.
3
Unpacking the effects of personality traits on algorithmic awareness: The mediating role of previous knowledge and moderating role of internet use.
剖析人格特质对算法意识的影响:先前知识的中介作用与互联网使用的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:953892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953892. eCollection 2022.