Suppr超能文献

在一项历史性队列研究中观察到的递增式血液透析的益处。

Benefits of Incremental Hemodialysis Seen in a Historical Cohort Study.

作者信息

Chen Weisheng, Wang Mengjing, Zhang Minmin, Zhang Weichen, Shi Jun, Weng Jiamin, Huang Bihong, Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar, Chen Jing

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Nov 13;17:1177-1186. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S332218. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Previous research on incremental hemodialysis transition has mainly focused on one or two benefits or prognoses. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis by investigating whether incremental hemodialysis was simultaneously associated with adequate dialysis therapy, stable complication indicators, long-lasting arteriovenous vascular access, and long-lasting preservation of residual kidney function (RKF) without increasing mortality or hospitalization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Incident hemodialysis patients from Huashan Hospital in Shanghai, China, over the period of 2012 to 2019, were enrolled and followed every three months until death or the time of censoring. Changes in complication indicators from baseline to all post-baseline visits were analyzed by mixed-effects models. The outcomes of RKF loss, arteriovenous vascular access complications, and the composite of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events were compared between incremental and conventional hemodialysis by Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 113 patients enrolled in the study, 45 underwent incremental and 68 conventional hemodialysis. There were no significant differences in the changes from baseline to post-baseline visits in complication indicators between the two groups. Incremental hemodialysis reduced the risks of RKF loss (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.82), de novo arteriovenous access complication (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.82), and recurrent arteriovenous access complications under the Andersen-Gill (AG) model (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.74) and the Prentice, Williams and Peterson Total Time (PWP-TT) model (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80). There were no significant differences in all-cause hospitalization or the composite outcome between groups.

CONCLUSION

Incremental hemodialysis is an effective dialysis transition strategy that preserves RKF and arteriovenous access without affecting dialysis adequacy, patient stability, hospitalization risk and mortality risk. Randomized controlled trials are warranted.

摘要

目的

以往关于递增式血液透析过渡的研究主要集中在一两种益处或预后方面。我们旨在通过调查递增式血液透析是否同时与充分的透析治疗、稳定的并发症指标、持久的动静脉血管通路以及残余肾功能(RKF)的长期保留相关,且不增加死亡率或住院率,来进行全面分析。

患者与方法

纳入2012年至2019年期间来自中国上海华山医院的新血液透析患者,每三个月随访一次直至死亡或失访。通过混合效应模型分析从基线到所有基线后访视期间并发症指标的变化。采用Cox比例风险模型比较递增式血液透析和传统血液透析在RKF丧失、动静脉血管通路并发症以及全因死亡率和心血管事件综合指标方面的结局。

结果

该研究共纳入113例患者,其中45例行递增式血液透析,68例行传统血液透析。两组从基线到基线后访视期间并发症指标的变化无显著差异。在Andersen-Gill(AG)模型(风险比[HR],0.27;95%置信区间[CI],0.10-0.74)和Prentice、Williams和Peterson总时间(PWP-TT)模型(HR,0.31;95%CI,0.12-0.80)下,递增式血液透析降低了RKF丧失风险(HR,0.33;95%CI,0.14-0.82)、新发动静脉通路并发症风险(HR,0.26;95%CI,0.08-0.82)以及复发动静脉通路并发症风险。两组在全因住院率或综合结局方面无显著差异。

结论

递增式血液透析是一种有效的透析过渡策略,可保留RKF和动静脉通路,且不影响透析充分性、患者稳定性、住院风险和死亡风险。有必要进行随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验