Obi Yoshitsugu, Eriguchi Rieko, Ou Shuo-Ming, Rhee Connie M, Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Blood Purif. 2015;40(4):298-305. doi: 10.1159/000441577. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
The 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines suggest twice-weekly or incremental hemodialysis for patients with substantial residual kidney function (RKF). However, in most affluent nations de novo and abrupt transition to thrice-weekly hemodialysis is routinely prescribed for all dialysis-naïve patients regardless of their RKF. We review historical developments in hemodialysis therapy initiation and revisit twice-weekly hemodialysis as an individualized, incremental treatment especially upon first transitioning to hemodialysis therapy.
In the 1960's, hemodialysis treatment was first offered as a life-sustaining treatment in the form of long sessions (≥10 hours) administered every 5 to 7 days. Twice- and then thrice-weekly treatment regimens were subsequently developed to prevent uremic symptoms on a long-term basis. The thrice-weekly regimen has since become the 'standard of care' despite a lack of comparative studies. Some clinical studies have shown benefits of high hemodialysis dose by more frequent or longer treatment times mainly among patients with limited or no RKF. Conversely, in selected patients with higher levels of RKF and particularly higher urine volume, incremental or twice-weekly hemodialysis may preserve RKF and vascular access longer without compromising clinical outcomes. Proposed criteria for twice-weekly hemodialysis include urine output >500 ml/day, limited interdialytic weight gain, smaller body size relative to RKF, and favorable nutritional status, quality of life, and comorbidity profile.
Incremental hemodialysis including twice-weekly regimens may be safe and cost-effective treatment regimens that provide better quality of life for incident dialysis patients who have substantial RKF. These proposed criteria may guide incremental hemodialysis frequency and warrant future randomized controlled trials.
2006年《肾脏病预后质量倡议》指南建议,对于具有大量残余肾功能(RKF)的患者,采用每周两次或递增式血液透析。然而,在大多数富裕国家,所有初治透析患者无论其RKF如何,常规都采用每周三次血液透析的从头开始且突然的转变方式。我们回顾血液透析治疗起始的历史发展,并重新审视每周两次血液透析作为一种个体化的递增式治疗,尤其是在首次过渡到血液透析治疗时。
在20世纪60年代,血液透析治疗首次作为一种维持生命的治疗方法,以每5至7天进行一次长时间(≥10小时)的形式提供。随后开发了每周两次和每周三次的治疗方案,以长期预防尿毒症症状。尽管缺乏比较研究,但每周三次的方案此后已成为“护理标准”。一些临床研究表明,主要在RKF有限或无RKF的患者中,通过更频繁或更长的治疗时间进行高剂量血液透析有好处。相反,在某些RKF水平较高尤其是尿量较多的患者中,递增式或每周两次血液透析可能会在不影响临床结果的情况下,更长时间地保留RKF和血管通路。每周两次血液透析的建议标准包括尿量>500 ml/天、透析间期体重增加有限、相对于RKF体型较小,以及良好的营养状况、生活质量和合并症情况。
包括每周两次方案在内的递增式血液透析可能是安全且具有成本效益的治疗方案,可为具有大量RKF的初治透析患者提供更好的生活质量。这些建议标准可能指导递增式血液透析频率,并值得未来进行随机对照试验。