Suppr超能文献

患者健康问卷-9与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表在评估重度抑郁症中的比较

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder.

作者信息

Ma Simeng, Yang Jun, Yang Bingxiang, Kang Lijun, Wang Peilin, Zhang Nan, Wang Wei, Zong Xiaofen, Wang Ying, Bai Hanping, Guo Qingshan, Yao Lihua, Fang Li, Liu Zhongchun

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

School of Information Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 4;12:747139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747139. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) has been used for several decades to assess the severity of depression. Multiple studies have documented defects in this scale and deemed it unsuitable for clinical evaluation. The HAMD-6, which is the abbreviated version of HAMD-17, has been shown to be effective in assessing the core symptoms of depression with greater sensitivity than HAMD-17. And the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is suggested as an effective alternative to the HAMD-17 because of its simplicity and ease-of-use. Research was completed involving 1,741 participants having major depressive disorder. Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Kappa analysis was used to determine the reliability of the scales. Pearson correlation analysis and factor analysis were used to analyze validity. Item response theory (IRT) was used to analyze psychological characteristics of items in both the HAMD-17 and PHQ-9. Reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach's alpha of the HAMD-17, HAMD-6 and PHQ-9 were 0.829, 0.764, and 0.893 respectively, and the ICC of the three scales ranged from 0.606 to 0.744. The Kappa score of the consistency of depression severity assessment was 0.248. Validity analysis showed that the PHQ-9 was a single factor structure, and the total score of the scale was strongly correlated with the HAMD-17 ( = 0.724, < 0.001). The IRT analysis showed that the discrimination parameters of the PHQ-9 were higher than that of the HAMD-17 in all dimensions. The HAMD-6 had the lowest measurement accuracy in distinguishing the severity of depression, while the PHQ-9 had the highest measurement accuracy. Results showed that the PHQ-9 was satisfactory in terms of reliability, validity and distinguishing the severity of depression. It is a simple, rapid, effective and reliable tool which can be used as an alternative to the HAMD-17 to assess the severity of depression.

摘要

汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD - 17)已被用于评估抑郁严重程度数十年。多项研究记录了该量表存在的缺陷,并认为它不适用于临床评估。HAMD - 6是HAMD - 17的简化版本,已被证明在评估抑郁核心症状方面比HAMD - 17更具敏感性。由于其简单易用,患者健康问卷 - 9(PHQ - 9)被建议作为HAMD - 17的有效替代方案。对1741名患有重度抑郁症的参与者进行了研究。采用克朗巴哈系数、组内相关系数(ICC)和加权卡帕分析来确定量表的信度。使用皮尔逊相关分析和因子分析来分析效度。项目反应理论(IRT)用于分析HAMD - 17和PHQ - 9中项目的心理特征。信度分析表明,HAMD - 17、HAMD - 6和PHQ - 9的克朗巴哈系数分别为0.829、0.764和0.893,三个量表的ICC范围为0.606至0.744。抑郁严重程度评估一致性的卡帕得分是0.248。效度分析表明,PHQ - 9为单因素结构,量表总分与HAMD - 17高度相关(= 0.724,< 0.001)。IRT分析表明,PHQ - 9在所有维度上的区分参数均高于HAMD - 17。HAMD - 6在区分抑郁严重程度方面测量准确性最低,而PHQ - 9测量准确性最高。结果表明,PHQ - 9在信度、效度和区分抑郁严重程度方面表现令人满意。它是一种简单、快速、有效且可靠的工具,可作为HAMD - 17的替代方案用于评估抑郁严重程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ff1/8599822/3492c43d7e97/fpsyt-12-747139-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验