Suppr超能文献

技术工具如何影响英语学术写作中的写作表现、词汇复杂性和自我调节学习策略认知:一项比较研究

How Technology Tools Impact Writing Performance, Lexical Complexity, and Perceived Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in EFL Academic Writing: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Han Yangxi, Zhao Shuo, Ng Lee-Luan

机构信息

Faculty of Languages and Linguistics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Faculty of Foreign Studies, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 3;12:752793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752793. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Students experience different levels of autonomy based on the mediation of self-regulated learning (SRL), but little is known about the effects of different mediation technologies on students' perceived SRL strategies. This mixed explanatory study compared two technology mediation models, Icourse (a learning management system) and Icourse+Pigai (an automatic writing evaluation system), with a control group that did not use technology. A quasi-experimental design was used, which involved a pre and post-intervention academic writing test, an SRL questionnaire, and one-to-one semi-structured student interviews. The aim was to investigate 280 Chinese undergraduate English as a foreign language (EFL) students' academic writing performance, lexical complexity, and perceptions of self-regulated strategies in academic writing. One-way ANCOVA of writing performance, Kruskal-Wallis test of lexical complexity, ANOVA of the SRL questionnaire, and grounded thematic content analysis revealed that, first, both Icourse and Icourse+Pigai provided significant support for the development of SRL strategies vs. the control group, although there was no significant difference between the two groups. Second, Icourse+Pigai-supported SRL was more helpful for improving students' academic writing performance because it enabled increased writing practice and correction feedback. Third, Icourse+Pigai-supported SRL did not significantly improve students' lexical complexity. In conclusion, we argue that both learning management systems and automated writing evaluation (AWE) platforms may be used to assist students' SRL learning to enhance their writing performance. More effort should be directed toward developing technological tools that increase both lexical accuracy and lexical complexity. We conclude that the technical tools used in this study were positively connected to the use of SRL techniques. However, when creating technologically mediated SRL activities, students' psychological study preferences should be considered.

摘要

基于自我调节学习(SRL)的中介作用,学生体验到不同程度的自主性,但对于不同的中介技术对学生感知到的SRL策略的影响却知之甚少。这项混合解释性研究将两种技术中介模型,即爱课程(一个学习管理系统)和爱课程+批改网(一个自动写作评估系统),与一个不使用技术的对照组进行了比较。采用了准实验设计,其中包括干预前和干预后的学术写作测试、一份SRL问卷以及一对一的半结构化学生访谈。目的是调查280名中国非英语专业本科学生的学术写作表现、词汇复杂性以及他们在学术写作中对自我调节策略的认知。写作表现的单向协方差分析、词汇复杂性的克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验、SRL问卷的方差分析以及扎根主题内容分析表明,首先,与对照组相比,爱课程和爱课程+批改网都为SRL策略的发展提供了显著支持,尽管两组之间没有显著差异。其次,爱课程+批改网支持的SRL对提高学生的学术写作表现更有帮助,因为它能够增加写作练习和批改反馈。第三,爱课程+批改网支持的SRL并没有显著提高学生的词汇复杂性。总之,我们认为学习管理系统和自动写作评估(AWE)平台都可用于协助学生的SRL学习,以提高他们的写作表现。应该更加努力地开发能够提高词汇准确性和词汇复杂性的技术工具。我们得出结论,本研究中使用的技术工具与SRL技术的使用呈正相关。然而,在创建技术中介的SRL活动时,应该考虑学生的心理学习偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a498/8596490/00daf323ba8d/fpsyg-12-752793-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验