Suppr超能文献

重新审视植物在高浓度二氧化碳环境下氮素缺乏的原因:无论施肥形式如何,满足氮需求的重要性。

Revisiting Why Plants Become N Deficient Under Elevated CO: Importance to Meet N Demand Regardless of the Fed-Form.

作者信息

Igarashi Maaya, Yi Yan, Yano Katsuya

机构信息

Laboratory of Crop Science, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2021 Nov 4;12:726186. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.726186. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

An increase in plant biomass under elevated CO (eCO) is usually lower than expected. N-deficiency induced by eCO is often considered to be a reason for this. Several hypotheses explain the induced N-deficiency: (1) eCO inhibits nitrate assimilation, (2) eCO lowers nitrate acquisition due to reduced transpiration, or (3) eCO reduces plant N concentration with increased biomass. We tested them using C (wheat, rice, and potato) and C plants (guinea grass, and ) grown in chambers at 400 (ambient CO, aCO) or 800 (eCO) μL L CO. In most species, we could not confirm hypothesis (1) with the measurements of plant nitrate accumulation in each organ. The exception was rice showing a slight inhibition of nitrate assimilation at eCO, but the biomass was similar between the nitrate and urea-fed plants. Contrary to hypothesis (2), eCO did not decrease plant nitrate acquisition despite reduced transpiration because of enhanced nitrate acquisition per unit transpiration in all species. Comparing to aCO, eCO remarkably enhanced water-use efficiency, especially in C plants, decreasing water demand for CO acquisition. As our results supported hypothesis (3) without any exception, we then examined if lowered N concentration at eCO indeed limits the growth using C wheat and C guinea grass under various levels of nitrate-N supply. While eCO significantly increased relative growth rate (RGR) in wheat but not in guinea grass, each species increased RGR with higher N supply and then reached a maximum as no longer N was limited. To achieve the maximum RGR, wheat required a 1.3-fold N supply at eCO than aCO with 2.2-fold biomass. However, the N requirement by guinea grass was less affected by the eCO treatment. The results reveal that accelerated RGR by eCO could create a demand for more N, especially in the leaf sheath rather than the leaf blade in wheat, causing N-limitation unless the additional N was supplied. We concluded that eCO amplifies N-limitation due to accelerated growth rate rather than inhibited nitrate assimilation or acquisition. Our results suggest that plant growth under higher CO will become more dependent on N but less dependent on water to acquire both CO and N.

摘要

在高浓度二氧化碳(eCO)条件下,植物生物量的增加通常低于预期。人们通常认为,eCO导致的氮缺乏是造成这种情况的一个原因。有几种假说可以解释这种诱导性氮缺乏:(1)eCO抑制硝酸盐同化;(2)eCO由于蒸腾作用降低而减少了硝酸盐的获取;或者(3)eCO随着生物量的增加降低了植物的氮浓度。我们使用C₃植物(小麦、水稻和马铃薯)和C₄植物(几内亚草等)在400(环境CO₂,aCO)或800(eCO)μL L⁻¹ CO₂浓度的生长箱中进行了测试。在大多数物种中,通过测量各器官中的植物硝酸盐积累量,我们无法证实假说(1)。例外的是水稻,在eCO条件下硝酸盐同化略有抑制,但硝酸盐和尿素喂养的植物之间生物量相似。与假说(2)相反,尽管蒸腾作用降低,但eCO并没有减少植物对硝酸盐的获取,因为所有物种单位蒸腾作用的硝酸盐获取量增加了。与aCO相比,eCO显著提高了水分利用效率,尤其是在C₄植物中,减少了获取CO₂所需的水分需求。由于我们的结果无一例外地支持假说(3),然后我们研究了在不同水平的硝态氮供应下,eCO条件下降低的氮浓度是否确实限制了C₃小麦和C₄几内亚草的生长。虽然eCO显著提高了小麦的相对生长速率(RGR),但几内亚草没有,每个物种随着氮供应的增加而提高RGR,然后在不再受氮限制时达到最大值。为了达到最大RGR,与aCO相比,eCO条件下小麦所需的氮供应量增加了1.3倍,生物量增加了2.2倍。然而,几内亚草的氮需求受eCO处理的影响较小。结果表明eCO加速的RGR会产生对更多氮的需求,尤其是在小麦的叶鞘而非叶片中,除非供应额外的氮,否则会导致氮限制。我们得出结论,eCO由于生长速率加快而加剧了氮限制,而不是由于硝酸盐同化或获取受到抑制。我们的结果表明,在更高CO₂浓度下植物的生长将更加依赖氮,但在获取CO₂和氮方面对水的依赖程度降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dc6/8600045/ff33805652b2/fpls-12-726186-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验