Etaware Peter Mudiaga
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022 Mar;73:103337. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103337. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
The 2nd phase of COVID-19 infection outbreak experienced worldwide is an attestation to the decline in the efficiency of COVID-19 detection kits available worldwide. rRT-PCR still remains the best confirmatory test for COVID-19 infection. Sadly, most medical professionals are not conversant with the rRT-PCR protocols. Therefore, more easy-to-use alternatives are required as backup, to compensate for these lapses. "Etaware-CDT-2020" is a virtual system designed for early detection of COVID-19 infection. A comparative COVID-19 diagnosis was conducted using Etaware-CDT-2020, corroborated by rRT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 results obtained from China (Latitude 35.8617N and Longitude 104.1954E), which was the epicentre for COVID-19 infection outbreak. A cross-comparison of results showed that there was a positive correlation between the output result from Etaware-CDT-2020 and rRT-PCR diagnosis from Wuhan (r = 0.92) and Hubei (r = 0.97). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the diagnostic results of "Etaware-CDT-2020" and rRT-PCR, when compared by T-test (P(t = 0) > 0.05) and Pearson's Chi-Square test (0.04 ≥ P ≤ 0.12). Etaware-CDT-2020 is unique and can be used anywhere, anytime and by anyone. It is accessible, affordable, easy to install, simple to understand and user friendly.
全球范围内经历的新冠病毒感染爆发的第二阶段证明了全球可用的新冠病毒检测试剂盒效率的下降。逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)仍然是新冠病毒感染的最佳确诊检测方法。遗憾的是,大多数医学专业人员并不熟悉rRT-PCR检测方案。因此,需要更多易于使用的替代方法作为备份,以弥补这些不足。“Etaware-CDT-2020”是一个为早期检测新冠病毒感染而设计的虚拟系统。使用Etaware-CDT-2020进行了新冠病毒感染的对比诊断,并得到了来自新冠病毒感染爆发中心中国(北纬35.8617度,东经104.1954度)的rRT-PCR确诊的新冠病毒感染结果的佐证。结果的交叉比较表明,Etaware-CDT-2020的输出结果与来自武汉(r = 0.92)和湖北(r = 0.97)的rRT-PCR诊断结果之间存在正相关。此外,通过t检验(P(t = 0) > 0.05)和皮尔逊卡方检验(0.04≥P≤0.12)比较时,“Etaware-CDT-2020”和rRT-PCR的诊断结果之间没有显著差异。Etaware-CDT-2020独一无二,任何人在任何时间、任何地点都可以使用。它易于获取、价格实惠、易于安装、易于理解且用户友好。