Suppr超能文献

基于评估替代假设的主动学习干预提高了生物学入门课程中对照实验的科学素养。

An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology.

作者信息

Kreher Scott A, Pavlova Iglika V, Nelms April

机构信息

Dominican University, River Forest, Illinois, USA.

University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 Oct 29;22(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00172-21. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Scientific education provides a set of tools to make sense of a complex world by teasing out complicated cause-and-effect relationships, such as the elimination of effects of confounding factors in controlled experiments. There is evidence that depth of understanding of controlled experiments is lacking among undergraduate science students despite exposure to controlled experiments in courses. To examine the understanding of controlled experiments, we developed a two-tiered assessment that includes closed-ended and open-ended questions, with three types of questions, i.e., (i) a scientific scenario about a flawed drug study, (ii) an everyday-life scenario about flawed thinking regarding product effectiveness, and (iii) a direct question about explaining controlled experiments. Consistent with previous findings, we demonstrated that large percentages of students in introductory biology courses at both a research-intensive institution and a primarily undergraduate, minority-serving institution failed to recognize the need to account for confounds. Based on these findings, we tested the hypothesis that scientific literacy could be improved through a course-based intervention using an active learning framework focused on science as a process of evaluating alternative hypotheses. We found start-to-end-of-semester improvement in students' identification of unaccounted confounds with a scientific scenario in an intervention course but not in the control course. Interestingly, students in both the control and intervention courses showed improvement when tested with a scenario based on everyday life. The study findings suggest that a concerning number of college students may not account sufficiently for uncontrolled variables in real-life situations, and we present a widely applicable instructional strategy that improves on this broadly relevant scientific reasoning skill.

摘要

科学教育提供了一套工具,通过梳理复杂的因果关系来理解一个复杂的世界,比如在对照实验中消除混杂因素的影响。有证据表明,尽管本科理科学生在课程中接触过对照实验,但他们对对照实验的理解仍不够深入。为了考察学生对对照实验的理解,我们开发了一种两层评估方法,包括封闭式和开放式问题,有三种类型的问题,即:(i)一个关于有缺陷的药物研究的科学情景;(ii)一个关于对产品有效性存在错误思维的日常生活情景;(iii)一个关于解释对照实验的直接问题。与之前的研究结果一致,我们发现,在一所研究型机构和一所主要为本科生服务的少数族裔机构的生物学入门课程中,很大比例的学生没有认识到需要考虑混杂因素。基于这些发现,我们检验了这样一个假设,即可以通过基于课程的干预来提高科学素养,该干预使用一个以科学作为评估替代假设过程为重点的主动学习框架。我们发现在干预课程中,学生在识别科学情景中未考虑的混杂因素方面,从学期开始到结束有进步,而在对照课程中则没有。有趣的是,当用基于日常生活的情景进行测试时,对照课程和干预课程的学生都有进步。研究结果表明,相当数量的大学生在现实生活中可能没有充分考虑到未控制的变量,我们提出了一种广泛适用的教学策略,以提高这种广泛相关的科学推理能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验