Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0160.
The final report challenged institutions to reform their biology courses to focus on process skills and student active learning, among other recommendations. A large southeastern university implemented curricular changes to its majors' introductory biology sequence in alignment with these recommendations. Discussion sections focused on developing student process skills were added to both lectures and a lab, and one semester of lab was removed. This curriculum was implemented using active-learning techniques paired with student collaboration. This study determined whether these changes resulted in a higher gain of student scientific literacy by conducting pre/posttesting of scientific literacy for two cohorts: students experiencing the unreformed curriculum and students experiencing the reformed curriculum. Retention of student scientific literacy for each cohort was also assessed 4 months later. At the end of the academic year, scientific literacy gains were significantly higher for students in the reformed curriculum ( = 0.005), with those students having double the scientific literacy gains of the cohort in the unreformed curriculum. Retention of scientific literacy did not differ between the cohorts.
最终报告要求各机构改革其生物学课程,以专注于培养学生的过程技能和主动学习能力等,此外还提出了其他建议。东南部的一所大型大学根据这些建议对其专业的生物学入门课程序列进行了课程改革。在讲座和实验室中都增加了侧重于培养学生过程技能的讨论环节,并取消了一个学期的实验。该课程采用了结合学生合作的主动学习技巧来实施。本研究通过对两个队列(经历未改革课程的学生和经历改革课程的学生)进行科学素养的预/后测试,以确定这些改革是否导致学生科学素养的提高。4 个月后,还评估了每个队列学生的科学素养保留情况。在学年结束时,改革课程学生的科学素养提高幅度显著更高( = 0.005),与未改革课程学生相比,这些学生的科学素养提高幅度是后者的两倍。两个队列的科学素养保留情况没有差异。