Harwell Matthew C, Jackson Chloe A
US EPA, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Newport, OR 97365, USA.
US EPA, Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA.
Sustainability. 2021 Jul 23;13(15):1-8249. doi: 10.3390/su13158249.
A conceptual framework is helpful to understand what types of ecosystem services (ES) information is needed to support decision making. Principles of structured decision making are helpful for articulating how ES consideration can influence different elements in a given decision context resulting in changes to the environment, human health, and well-being. This article presents a holistic view of an ES framework, summarizing two decades of the US EPA's ES research, including recent advances in ES, those ES that provide benefits directly to people. Approximately 150 peer-reviewed publications, technical reports, and book chapters characterize a large ES research portfolio. In introducing framework elements and the suite of relevant US EPA research for each element, both challenges and opportunities are identified. Lessons from research to advance each of the final ES elements can be useful for identifying gaps and future science needs. Ultimately, the goal of this article is to help the reader develop an operational understanding of the final ES conceptual framework, an understanding of the state of science for a number of ES elements, and an introduction to some ES tools, models, and frameworks that may be of use in their case-study applications or decision-making contexts.
一个概念框架有助于理解支持决策需要哪些类型的生态系统服务(ES)信息。结构化决策原则有助于阐明如何在特定决策背景下考虑生态系统服务,从而影响不同要素,进而导致环境、人类健康和福祉的变化。本文提出了一个生态系统服务框架的整体观点,总结了美国环境保护局(US EPA)二十年的生态系统服务研究,包括生态系统服务的最新进展,即那些直接造福人类的生态系统服务。约150篇同行评审出版物、技术报告和书籍章节描述了一个庞大的生态系统服务研究项目。在介绍框架要素以及针对每个要素的相关美国环境保护局研究时,识别了挑战和机遇。推进每个最终生态系统服务要素的研究经验教训,有助于识别差距和未来的科学需求。最终,本文的目标是帮助读者对最终的生态系统服务概念框架形成实际理解,了解一些生态系统服务要素的科学现状,并介绍一些可能在其案例研究应用或决策背景中有用的生态系统服务工具、模型和框架。