Du Hang, Zhong Binyan, Zhang Peng, Wang Wansheng, Shen Jian, Zhang Shuai, Li Wanci, Tang Haohuan, Zhou Linfeng, Yang Weihao, Zhu Xiaoli
Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Hubei Cancer Research Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, HuBei, China.
J Interv Med. 2020 Oct 12;4(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2020.10.007. eCollection 2021 Feb.
To present a case series of modified transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) and percutaneous transhepatic intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (PTIPS) in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding (VB). In addition, the scientific literature pertaining to PTIPS was reviewed.
This retrospective clinical case series included six cirrhotic patients with VB who were treated with PTIPS after the failure of endoscopic band ligation or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy combined with vasoactive drugs. The treatment was conducted between January 2017 and June 2019 at a single institution. Three patients suffered from severe atrophy of the right or left lobar of the liver as well as the main right or left branch of the portal vein. The remaining three patients showed severe atrophy of the whole liver and portal vein, resulting in widening of the liver fissure. A paired -test was used to compare the changes in portal pressure gradient between before and after the PTIPS operation. The rebleeding rate, treatment efficacy, complications, and technical success rate were all assessed during follow-up.
All six PTIPS procedures were performed successfully, with no severe procedural-related complications observed. None of the patients experienced VB during a mean follow-up of 22.8 (range, 18.0-28.0) months. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient decreased from 28.3 ± 4.3 mmHg pre-procedure to 12.3 ± 2.6 mmHg immediately post-procedure (P < 0.001). At follow-up, one patient was found to have developed grade 2 hepatic encephalopathy thrice during the first year, according to the West Haven criteria. However, this was resolved following medical treatment.
When the patient's portal venous anatomy is unconducive to the performance of TIPS using the transjugular approach, PTIPS can be considered as a safe, effective complementary surgical approach for patients with VB.
介绍一系列肝硬化静脉曲张出血(VB)患者接受改良经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)和经皮经肝门静脉分流术(PTIPS)的病例。此外,对有关PTIPS的科学文献进行了综述。
本回顾性临床病例系列包括6例肝硬化VB患者,这些患者在内镜下套扎术或内镜注射硬化剂联合血管活性药物治疗失败后接受了PTIPS治疗。治疗于2017年1月至2019年6月在单一机构进行。3例患者存在肝右叶或左叶以及门静脉主要右支或左支的严重萎缩。其余3例患者表现为全肝和门静脉严重萎缩,导致肝裂增宽。采用配对检验比较PTIPS手术前后门静脉压力梯度的变化。在随访期间评估再出血率、治疗效果、并发症和技术成功率。
所有6例PTIPS手术均成功完成,未观察到严重的手术相关并发症。在平均22.8(范围18.0 - 28.0)个月的随访期间,所有患者均未发生VB。门静脉压力梯度平均值从术前的28.3±4.3 mmHg降至术后即刻的12.3±2.6 mmHg(P < 0.001)。随访时,根据韦斯特黑文标准,1例患者在第一年中三次发生2级肝性脑病。然而,经药物治疗后病情得到缓解。
当患者的门静脉解剖结构不利于采用经颈静脉途径进行TIPS时,PTIPS可被视为VB患者一种安全、有效的补充手术方法。