• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交际线索如何塑造狗(家犬)对物体进行编码的方式?

How do communicative cues shape the way that dogs (Canis familiaris) encode objects?

作者信息

Johnston Angie M, Arre Alyssa M, Bogese Michael J, Santos Laurie R

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2021 Nov;135(4):534-544. doi: 10.1037/com0000245. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1037/com0000245
PMID:34807701
Abstract

Our human capacity to efficiently learn from other individuals is unparalleled in any nonhuman species. Some scholars argue that our propensity to learn socially is supported by an early-emerging expectation that communicative cues will convey generic information (Csibra & Gergely, 2011). In the current 2 studies, we examine whether this expectation about generic information is unique to humans by testing a species that readily attends to human cues-dogs. Specifically, we adapted a violation of expectation paradigm previously used with human infants to examine whether communicative cues lead dogs to selectively encode generic, kind-relevant information about objects (e.g., shape). Prior work has demonstrated that human infants are more likely to notice unexpected changes in kind-relevant information in communicative contexts (i.e., when an agent points to the object; Yoon et al., 2008). In contrast, across 2 studies ( = 136), dogs were no more likely to notice kind-relevant changes in communicative contexts than noncommunicative contexts. These findings suggest that although dogs attend to human communicative cues, such cues do not shape the way that dogs encode objects. More broadly, this finding lends support to the claim that our early-emerging generic expectation crucially supports our human capacity to efficiently learn from one another. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们人类从他人身上高效学习的能力在任何非人类物种中都是无与伦比的。一些学者认为,我们在社会中学习的倾向得到了一种早期出现的期望的支持,即交流线索会传达一般信息(齐布拉和盖尔盖利,2011)。在当前的两项研究中,我们通过测试一种容易关注人类线索的物种——狗,来检验这种对一般信息的期望是否为人类所独有。具体来说,我们改编了一种先前用于人类婴儿的违背期望范式,以检验交流线索是否会引导狗选择性地编码关于物体的一般的、与类别相关的信息(例如形状)。先前的研究表明,人类婴儿在交流情境中(即当一个主体指向物体时)更有可能注意到与类别相关信息的意外变化(尹等人,2008)。相比之下,在两项研究(N = 136)中,狗在交流情境中并不比在非交流情境中更有可能注意到与类别相关的变化。这些发现表明,虽然狗会关注人类的交流线索,但这些线索并不会影响狗对物体进行编码的方式。更广泛地说,这一发现支持了这样一种观点,即我们早期出现的一般期望对我们人类相互高效学习的能力至关重要。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
How do communicative cues shape the way that dogs (Canis familiaris) encode objects?交际线索如何塑造狗(家犬)对物体进行编码的方式?
J Comp Psychol. 2021 Nov;135(4):534-544. doi: 10.1037/com0000245. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
Reassessing shelter dogs' use of human communicative cues in the standard object-choice task.重新评估收容所犬在标准物体选择任务中对人类交流线索的使用。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213166. eCollection 2019.
3
Dogs do not demonstrate a human-like bias to defer to communicative cues.狗不会表现出像人类那样倾向于听从交流线索的偏好。
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):449-461. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0341-2.
4
Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants.狗、狼和人类婴儿对人类交流的差异敏感性。
Science. 2009 Sep 4;325(5945):1269-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1176960.
5
Dogs (Canis familiaris), but not chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), understand imperative pointing.狗(Canis familiaris),但不是黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes),能够理解命令式指向。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030913. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
6
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
7
The attribution of navigational- and goal-directed agency in dogs (Canis familiaris) and human toddlers (Homo sapiens).犬类(家犬)和人类幼儿(智人)中导航和目标导向能动性的归因。
J Comp Psychol. 2017 Feb;131(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/com0000053.
8
Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task?为什么狗(Canis familiaris)会在观察学习任务中选择空容器?
Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):259-68. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0359-0. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
9
Spatial generalization of imitation in dogs (Canis familiaris).犬类(家犬)模仿行为的空间泛化
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Aug;130(3):249-58. doi: 10.1037/com0000033. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
10
Why do adult dogs (Canis familiaris) commit the A-not-B search error?成年犬(家犬)为何会出现A非B寻找错误?
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Feb;128(1):21-30. doi: 10.1037/a0033084. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating responses to object-labels in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).研究家犬(Canis familiaris)对物体标签的反应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 23;13(1):3150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30201-1.
2
Individual recognition and long-term memory of inanimate interactive agents and humans in dogs.狗对无生命互动代理和人类的个体识别和长期记忆。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec;25(6):1427-1442. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01624-6. Epub 2022 May 5.