Schabel F M, Trader M W, Laster W R, Wheeler G P, Witt M H
Antibiot Chemother (1971). 1978;23:200-15. doi: 10.1159/000401484.
Alkylating anticancer drugs are varied in chemical structure, alkylating moieties, and likely mechanisms of cytotoxic activity for vital normal cells and sensitive tumor cells. This has been objectively documented by numerous examples illustrating: (1) different in vitro and in vivo reaction products; (2) greater than additive, additive, and less than additive cytotoxicity of drug combinations for vital normal cells in the mouse; (3) readily reproducible and often marked therapeutic synergism between a variety of 2-drug combinations of alkylating agents against a wide variety of histologic types of murine tumors, and (4) observed resistance and cross-resistance of a variety of murine tumors, selected for resistance to specific alkylating agents, compatible with recognized chemical and functional differences between these drugs. The most important observations on resistance and cross-resistance reported are: (a) L1210 cells selected for complete resistance to cyclophosphamide (CPA) retain full sensitivity to selected nitrosoureas (BCNU, CCNU, MeCCNU), chlorozotocin), dianhydrogalactitol, and cis-DDPt, while retaining marked but somewhat reduced sensitivity to L-PAM, piperazinedione, and thioTEPA. (B) L1210 cells selected for resistance to BCNU retain full sensitivity to CPA, L-PAM, and dianhydrogalactitol. They show complete cross-resistance to BIC and variable cross-resistance to other selected nitrosoureas and piperazinedione. (c) L1210/L-PAM has incomplete but marked resistance to L-PAM. It is similar to the parent drug-sensitive line (L1210/0) in response to BCNU, CCNU, MeCCNU, and BIC. It is variably (usually moderately) cross-resistant to CPA, chlorozotocin, dianhydrogalactitol, and thioTEPA, but is completely cross-resistant to cis-DDPt. These resistance and cross-resistance patterns, which are consistent with most other biological and chemical principles established with these alkylating agents, may be useful in selecting alkylating drug combinations for inclusion in chemotherapy protocols in man which, on the basis of diverse observations in animal tumor systems, appear to be clearly indicated.
烷化剂抗癌药物在化学结构、烷化基团以及对重要正常细胞和敏感肿瘤细胞的细胞毒性作用机制方面各不相同。众多实例已客观地证明了这一点,这些实例表明:(1) 不同的体外和体内反应产物;(2) 药物组合对小鼠重要正常细胞的细胞毒性大于相加、相加和小于相加;(3) 多种烷化剂的二药组合对多种组织学类型的小鼠肿瘤具有易于重现且通常显著的治疗协同作用;(4) 多种对特定烷化剂产生抗性的小鼠肿瘤表现出观察到的抗性和交叉抗性,这与这些药物之间公认的化学和功能差异相符。所报道的关于抗性和交叉抗性的最重要观察结果如下:(a) 对环磷酰胺(CPA)产生完全抗性的L1210细胞对选定的亚硝基脲(BCNU、CCNU、MeCCNU)、氯脲霉素、二脱水半乳糖醇和顺铂仍保持完全敏感性,同时对左旋苯丙氨酸氮芥、哌嗪二酮和噻替派仍保持显著但有所降低的敏感性。(b) 对BCNU产生抗性的L1210细胞对CPA、左旋苯丙氨酸氮芥和二脱水半乳糖醇仍保持完全敏感性。它们对BIC表现出完全交叉抗性,对其他选定的亚硝基脲和哌嗪二酮表现出可变交叉抗性。(c) L1210/L-PAM对左旋苯丙氨酸氮芥具有不完全但显著的抗性。它在对BCNU、CCNU、MeCCNU和BIC的反应方面与亲本药物敏感系(L1210/0)相似。它对CPA、氯脲霉素、二脱水半乳糖醇和噻替派具有可变(通常为中等程度)交叉抗性,但对顺铂完全交叉抗性。这些抗性和交叉抗性模式与用这些烷化剂确立的大多数其他生物学和化学原理一致,可能有助于选择烷化剂药物组合用于人类化疗方案,基于在动物肿瘤系统中的各种观察结果,这似乎是明确指示的。