Jang Young Hoon, Oh Seung Yeol, Kim Sae Hoon
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Uijeongbu-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):940-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Baseplate screws have been suggested to be a possible cause of suprascapular neuropathy after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Three-dimensional analyses of screw penetration and confirmation of its clinical impacts are relevant. The study aims to investigate the association between screw penetration and the clinical outcomes.
Eighty-two patients who underwent RTSA for a massive rotator cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy, or osteoarthritis with rotator cuff tear were retrospectively enrolled. They were followed up for a minimum of 12 months, and all underwent computed tomography at 1 year postoperatively. The lengths of the superior and posterior baseplate screws were documented. Postoperative computed tomography images were subjected to 3-dimensional analysis to determine whether superior or posterior screws penetrated the glenoid vault and the location to which they penetrated, and screw-to-nerve distances were measured to estimate risks of screw nerve violation and iatrogenic suprascapular neuropathy. Patients with any screw <5 mm from the suprascapular nerve were deemed to have a high risk. Clinical outcomes (functional scores, ranges of motion, and isometric strengths) of patients in the high- and lower-risk groups were compared.
The mean lengths of the superior and posterior screws were 28 ± 4 mm and 18 ± 3 mm, respectively. Penetration was detected for 13% of superior screws and 64% of posterior screws. Sixty-three percent of penetrating superior screws and 5% of penetrating posterior screws were <5 mm from the suprascapular nerve, and therefore, 12% of patients who received RTSA were assessed to have a high risk of iatrogenic suprascapular neuropathy. However, no significant difference was detected in clinical outcomes between the high- and lower-risk patients after a mean follow-up period of 20 months.
Twelve percent of patients who received RTSA were assessed to be at high risk of iatrogenic suprascapular neuropathy by baseplate screw penetration. However, the clinical outcomes of RTSA at a minimum follow-up of 1 year were similar in the high- and lower-risk groups.
在反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)后,基板螺钉被认为可能是肩胛上神经病变的一个原因。对螺钉穿透情况进行三维分析并确认其临床影响具有重要意义。本研究旨在调查螺钉穿透与临床结果之间的关联。
回顾性纳入82例因巨大肩袖撕裂、肩袖撕裂性关节病或伴有肩袖撕裂的骨关节炎而接受RTSA的患者。对他们进行了至少12个月的随访,所有患者在术后1年均接受了计算机断层扫描。记录了上方和后方基板螺钉的长度。对术后计算机断层扫描图像进行三维分析,以确定上方或后方螺钉是否穿透肩胛盂穹窿及其穿透位置,并测量螺钉与神经的距离,以评估螺钉侵犯神经和医源性肩胛上神经病变的风险。任何螺钉距离肩胛上神经<5 mm的患者被视为高风险。比较了高风险组和低风险组患者的临床结果(功能评分、活动范围和等长肌力)。
上方和后方螺钉的平均长度分别为28±4 mm和18±3 mm。13%的上方螺钉和64%的后方螺钉检测到有穿透。63%的穿透上方螺钉和5%的穿透后方螺钉距离肩胛上神经<5 mm,因此,12%接受RTSA的患者被评估有医源性肩胛上神经病变的高风险。然而,在平均20个月的随访期后,高风险和低风险患者的临床结果未检测到显著差异。
12%接受RTSA的患者因基板螺钉穿透被评估有医源性肩胛上神经病变的高风险。然而,在至少随访1年时,RTSA在高风险组和低风险组的临床结果相似。