Spek Reinier W A, Hoogervorst Lotje A, Brink Rob C, Schoones Jan W, van Deurzen Derek F P, van den Bekerom Michel P J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Center, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024 Mar;27(1):88-107. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00493. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
The aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence on the following 10 technical aspects of glenoid baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA): screw insertion angles; screw orientation; screw quantity; screw length; screw type; baseplate tilt; baseplate position; baseplate version and rotation; baseplate design; and anatomical safe zones. Five literature libraries were searched for eligible clinical, cadaver, biomechanical, virtual planning, and finite element analysis studies. Studies including patients >16 years old in which at least one of the ten abovementioned technical aspects was assessed were suitable for analysis. We excluded studies of patients with: glenoid bone loss; bony increased offset-reversed shoulder arthroplasty; rTSA with bone grafts; and augmented baseplates. Quality assessment was performed for each included study. Sixty-two studies were included, of which 41 were experimental studies (13 cadaver, 10 virtual planning, 11 biomechanical, and 7 finite element studies) and 21 were clinical studies (12 retrospective cohorts and 9 case-control studies). Overall, the quality of included studies was moderate or high. The majority of studies agreed upon the use of a divergent screw fixation pattern, fixation with four screws (to reduce micromotions), and inferior positioning in neutral or anteversion. A general consensus was not reached on the other technical aspects. Most surgical aspects of baseplate fixation can be decided without affecting fixation strength. There is not a single strategy that provides the best outcome. Therefore, guidelines should cover multiple surgical options that can achieve adequate baseplate fixation.
本系统评价的目的是收集关于反式全肩关节置换术(rTSA)中肩胛盂基板固定的以下10个技术方面的证据:螺钉插入角度;螺钉方向;螺钉数量;螺钉长度;螺钉类型;基板倾斜度;基板位置;基板版本和旋转;基板设计;以及解剖学安全区。检索了五个文献库,以查找符合条件的临床、尸体、生物力学、虚拟规划和有限元分析研究。纳入分析的研究需包括年龄大于16岁的患者,且评估了上述十个技术方面中的至少一个方面。我们排除了以下患者的研究:肩胛盂骨丢失;骨增加偏移反式肩关节置换术;带骨移植的rTSA;以及增强型基板。对每项纳入研究进行质量评估。共纳入62项研究,其中41项为实验研究(13项尸体研究、10项虚拟规划研究、11项生物力学研究和7项有限元研究),21项为临床研究(12项回顾性队列研究和9项病例对照研究)。总体而言,纳入研究的质量为中等或高。大多数研究一致认为应采用发散螺钉固定模式、用四颗螺钉固定(以减少微动),并在中立位或前倾位进行下方定位。在其他技术方面未达成普遍共识。基板固定的大多数手术方面可以在不影响固定强度的情况下确定。没有一种单一的策略能提供最佳结果。因此,指南应涵盖多种能够实现充分基板固定的手术选择。