Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas.
Am J Perinatol. 2023 Dec;40(16):1820-1826. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739406. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
This study aimed to evaluate the views and influence of left-handedness among obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) trainees and educators and to identify perceived obstacles in training by left-handed (LH) trainees.
An online survey was sent to the U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology training programs. All participants were asked questions on hand preference for various medical and nonmedical activities, as well as on demographics. Participant responses to handedness and their role as a learner or educator directed them toward further questions. Trainees were surveyed on their experience and outlook as a LH physician in OBGYN. Educators were surveyed on their experience and attitudes in working with LH trainees. LH educators were also surveyed on their experience as a LH physician, similar to the LH trainees. Chi-square or Fisher's exact analysis was used as appropriate, with -value <0.05 considered statistically significant.
Responses were received from 21 training programs, totaling 304 individuals. Participants included 205 learners (156 right handed and 49 left handed), and 99 faculty (82 right handed and 17 left handed). A lack of LH surgical instrument availability (93.6%) and difficulty using right-handed (RH) instruments (83%) were notable obstacles reported by LH learners. The majority of LH learners (57.4%) did not consider their handedness to be disadvantageous but did note added difficulty when training under RH mentors when compared with training under LH mentors (66%). In contrast to LH educators, RH educators endorsed added difficulty in instructing operative procedures to LH learners (32.1 vs. 13.3%, = 0.012).
LH trainees face unique challenges during their OBGYN training. Educators would benefit from guidance on how best to manage these trainees. Educators should work to adapt surgical and procedural techniques to accommodate LH trainees.
· LH learners reported more difficulty in training under RH mentors.. · RH mentors reported increased difficulty in educating LH trainees.. · Neither trainees nor educators considered being LH a significant disadvantage..
本研究旨在评估妇产科(OBGYN)受训者和教育者对左撇子的看法和影响,并确定左撇子(LH)受训者在培训中感知到的障碍。
向美国妇产科培训项目发送了在线调查。所有参与者都被问及他们在各种医疗和非医疗活动中的手偏好问题,以及人口统计学问题。参与者对手的偏好及其作为学习者或教育者的角色的回答引导他们进一步提问。受训者被调查了他们作为妇产科 LH 医生的经验和前景。教育者被调查了他们在与 LH 受训者合作方面的经验和态度。LH 教育者还被调查了他们作为 LH 医生的经验,与 LH 受训者类似。使用卡方检验或 Fisher 精确检验,p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
收到了 21 个培训项目的回复,共计 304 人。参与者包括 205 名学习者(156 名右撇子和 49 名左撇子)和 99 名教师(82 名右撇子和 17 名左撇子)。LH 学习者报告了缺乏 LH 手术器械(93.6%)和使用右手(RH)器械困难(83%)等显著障碍。大多数 LH 学习者(57.4%)不认为他们的惯用手不利,但与接受 LH 导师培训相比,他们确实注意到在接受 RH 导师培训时更困难(66%)。与 LH 教育者相比,RH 教育者认为在向 LH 学习者教授手术程序时难度更大(32.1%对 13.3%,p=0.012)。
LH 受训者在 OBGYN 培训中面临独特的挑战。教育者将受益于如何最好地管理这些受训者的指导。教育者应努力调整手术和程序技术以适应 LH 受训者。
· LH 学习者报告在接受 RH 导师培训时更困难。· RH 导师报告在教育 LH 学习者时难度增加。· 受训者和教育者都不认为左撇子是一个显著的劣势。