Opt Express. 2021 Nov 22;29(24):40447-40461. doi: 10.1364/OE.438960.
With the development of wide color gamut displays, several recent studies investigated the performance of the CIE standard color matching functions (CMFs) in characterizing the color matches and observer metamerism between different primary sets. These studies, however, always employed different primaries to produce color stimuli, which failed to isolate the effect of the peak wavelength from that of the spectral shape. In this study, we carefully selected primaries with similar spectral shapes but different peak wavelengths. Human observers adjusted the intensities of the seven matching primary sets to match the color appearance of six stimuli, with a field of view around 5.7° × 5.7°, produced using a reference primary set, which was the same as one of the matching primary sets. The results clearly revealed the significant effect of the primary peak wavelength, and the failure of using chromaticities to characterize color matches using different primaries. The CIE 2006 2° CMFs were found to have the best performance in characterizing the color matches on average among the four CIE standard CMFs (i.e., the CIE 1931 2°, CIE 1964 2°, CIE 2006 2°, and CIE 2006 10° CMFs), which did not support the CIE's recommendation of using the 10° CMFs for stimuli beyond 4°. When the two categorical observer CMFs (i.e., Sarkar 2 set and Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication "BIGC" 17 set) were considered together, the BIGC 17 set had the best performance on average. More importantly, the performance of the CMFs varied with the primary sets. When the matching and reference sets were the same, the performance of all the CMFs were consistently good. In contrast, when the blue or green primary, or both of the two primaries, was shifted, the performance of all the CMFs became much worse. This clearly implies the importance of considering primary wavelengths when specifying color matches using different CMFs.
随着宽色域显示器的发展,最近有几项研究调查了 CIE 标准颜色匹配函数 (CMF) 在描述不同原色组之间的颜色匹配和观察者同色异谱的性能。然而,这些研究总是使用不同的原色来产生颜色刺激,这未能将峰值波长的影响与光谱形状的影响分开。在这项研究中,我们仔细选择了具有相似光谱形状但不同峰值波长的原色。人类观察者调整七个匹配原色组的强度,以匹配使用参考原色组(与匹配原色组之一相同)产生的六个刺激的颜色外观,视野约为 5.7°×5.7°。结果清楚地揭示了原色峰值波长的显著影响,以及使用色度来描述使用不同原色的颜色匹配的失败。在四个 CIE 标准 CMF(即 CIE 1931 2°、CIE 1964 2°、CIE 2006 2°和 CIE 2006 10°CMF)中,CIE 2006 2°CMF 平均表现最好,这与 CIE 推荐在 4°以上使用 10°CMF 刺激不符。当同时考虑两种分类观察者 CMF(即 Sarkar 2 集和北京印刷学院“BIGC”17 集)时,BIGC 17 集平均表现最好。更重要的是,CMF 的性能随原色组而变化。当匹配和参考集相同时,所有 CMF 的性能都一直很好。相比之下,当蓝色或绿色原色或两个原色都发生位移时,所有 CMF 的性能都变得更差。这清楚地表明,在使用不同的 CMF 指定颜色匹配时,考虑原色波长的重要性。