• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主波长峰值对配色和配色函数性能的影响。

Effect of primary peak wavelength on color matching and color matching function performance.

出版信息

Opt Express. 2021 Nov 22;29(24):40447-40461. doi: 10.1364/OE.438960.

DOI:10.1364/OE.438960
PMID:34809385
Abstract

With the development of wide color gamut displays, several recent studies investigated the performance of the CIE standard color matching functions (CMFs) in characterizing the color matches and observer metamerism between different primary sets. These studies, however, always employed different primaries to produce color stimuli, which failed to isolate the effect of the peak wavelength from that of the spectral shape. In this study, we carefully selected primaries with similar spectral shapes but different peak wavelengths. Human observers adjusted the intensities of the seven matching primary sets to match the color appearance of six stimuli, with a field of view around 5.7° × 5.7°, produced using a reference primary set, which was the same as one of the matching primary sets. The results clearly revealed the significant effect of the primary peak wavelength, and the failure of using chromaticities to characterize color matches using different primaries. The CIE 2006 2° CMFs were found to have the best performance in characterizing the color matches on average among the four CIE standard CMFs (i.e., the CIE 1931 2°, CIE 1964 2°, CIE 2006 2°, and CIE 2006 10° CMFs), which did not support the CIE's recommendation of using the 10° CMFs for stimuli beyond 4°. When the two categorical observer CMFs (i.e., Sarkar 2 set and Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication "BIGC" 17 set) were considered together, the BIGC 17 set had the best performance on average. More importantly, the performance of the CMFs varied with the primary sets. When the matching and reference sets were the same, the performance of all the CMFs were consistently good. In contrast, when the blue or green primary, or both of the two primaries, was shifted, the performance of all the CMFs became much worse. This clearly implies the importance of considering primary wavelengths when specifying color matches using different CMFs.

摘要

随着宽色域显示器的发展,最近有几项研究调查了 CIE 标准颜色匹配函数 (CMF) 在描述不同原色组之间的颜色匹配和观察者同色异谱的性能。然而,这些研究总是使用不同的原色来产生颜色刺激,这未能将峰值波长的影响与光谱形状的影响分开。在这项研究中,我们仔细选择了具有相似光谱形状但不同峰值波长的原色。人类观察者调整七个匹配原色组的强度,以匹配使用参考原色组(与匹配原色组之一相同)产生的六个刺激的颜色外观,视野约为 5.7°×5.7°。结果清楚地揭示了原色峰值波长的显著影响,以及使用色度来描述使用不同原色的颜色匹配的失败。在四个 CIE 标准 CMF(即 CIE 1931 2°、CIE 1964 2°、CIE 2006 2°和 CIE 2006 10°CMF)中,CIE 2006 2°CMF 平均表现最好,这与 CIE 推荐在 4°以上使用 10°CMF 刺激不符。当同时考虑两种分类观察者 CMF(即 Sarkar 2 集和北京印刷学院“BIGC”17 集)时,BIGC 17 集平均表现最好。更重要的是,CMF 的性能随原色组而变化。当匹配和参考集相同时,所有 CMF 的性能都一直很好。相比之下,当蓝色或绿色原色或两个原色都发生位移时,所有 CMF 的性能都变得更差。这清楚地表明,在使用不同的 CMF 指定颜色匹配时,考虑原色波长的重要性。

相似文献

1
Effect of primary peak wavelength on color matching and color matching function performance.主波长峰值对配色和配色函数性能的影响。
Opt Express. 2021 Nov 22;29(24):40447-40461. doi: 10.1364/OE.438960.
2
Color mismatch and observer metamerism between conventional liquid crystal displays and organic light emitting diode displays.传统液晶显示器与有机发光二极管显示器之间的颜色不匹配和观察者同色异谱现象。
Opt Express. 2021 Apr 12;29(8):12292-12306. doi: 10.1364/OE.418675.
3
Effect of observer age and stimulus size on the performance of CIE color matching functions.观察者年龄和刺激大小对 CIE 颜色匹配函数性能的影响。
Opt Express. 2022 May 9;30(10):16973-16986. doi: 10.1364/OE.457493.
4
Observer metamerism to display white point using different primary sets.使用不同原色集显示白点时的观察者同色异谱现象。
Opt Express. 2020 Jul 6;28(14):20305-20323. doi: 10.1364/OE.395568.
5
Color difference evaluations on metameric color stimuli by observers of three age groups.三个年龄组的观察者对同色异谱颜色刺激进行的色差评估。
Opt Express. 2023 Aug 14;31(17):28241-28256. doi: 10.1364/OE.495090.
6
From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent and average colorimetric observers.从CIE 2006生理模型到改进的年龄依赖性和平均色度观察者。
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2011 Oct 1;28(10):2033-48. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.28.002033.
7
Factors affecting colour matching between displays.影响显示器之间颜色匹配的因素。
Opt Express. 2022 Jul 18;30(15):26841-26855. doi: 10.1364/OE.462242.
8
Differential color thresholds from metameric matches: experimental results concerning failures of colorimetric additivity.来自同色异谱匹配的色差阈值:关于比色相加性失效的实验结果。
J Opt Soc Am A. 1986 Aug;3(8):1203-9. doi: 10.1364/josaa.3.001203.
9
Going beyond the 20th century color space to evaluate LED color consistency.超越20世纪色彩空间以评估LED颜色一致性。
Opt Express. 2023 Nov 6;31(23):38666-38687. doi: 10.1364/OE.504818.
10
Spatial color contrast matching: broad-bandpass functions and the flattening effect.空间颜色对比度匹配:宽带通函数与扁平化效应
Vision Res. 2000;40(23):3231-43. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00171-1.