Suppr超能文献

α-受体激动剂作为臂丛神经阻滞的辅助剂:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Alpha -receptor agonists as adjuvants for brachial plexus nerve blocks-A systematic review with meta-analyses.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Feb;66(2):186-206. doi: 10.1111/aas.14002. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We review the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as perineural or systemic adjuvants for brachial plexus blocks (BPB).

METHODS

We included randomised controlled trials on upper limb surgery with BPBs in adults, comparing dexmedetomidine with clonidine or either drug with placebo. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included adverse and serious adverse events. The review was conducted using Cochrane standards, trial sequential analyses (TSA) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

We included 101 trials with 6248 patients. Overall, duration of analgesia was prolonged with both clonidine (176 min [TSA adj. 95% CI: 118, 205, p < .00001; 33 trials]) and dexmedetomidine (292 min [TSA adj. 95% CI: 245 329, p < .00001; 53 trials]), but was longer for dexmedetomidine than clonidine (205 min [TSA adj. 95% CI: 157, 254, p < .00001; 19 trials]). Compared with placebo, dexmedetomidine was associated with bradycardia (RR 4.2 [95% CI 2.2, 8.3]), and both clonidine (RR 4.5 [95% CI 1.1, 18.3]) and dexmedetomidine (RR 3.9 [95% CI 2.0, 7.5]) were associated with hypotension. Serious adverse events were mostly related to block technique. GRADE-rated quality of evidence was low or very low.

CONCLUSION

Alpha2-receptor agonists used as adjuvants for BPBs lead to a prolonged duration of analgesia, with dexmedetomidine as the most efficient. Alpha2-receptor agonists were associated with increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events. The quality of evidence was low to very low.

摘要

背景

我们回顾了右美托咪定和可乐定作为臂丛阻滞(BPB)的周围神经或全身辅助药物的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们纳入了成人上肢手术中 BPB 的随机对照试验,比较了右美托咪定与可乐定或任何一种药物与安慰剂的效果。主要结局是镇痛持续时间。次要结局包括不良反应和严重不良反应。该综述按照 Cochrane 标准、试验序贯分析(TSA)和推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)进行。

结果

我们纳入了 101 项试验,共 6248 名患者。总体而言,两种药物均能延长镇痛时间:可乐定(176 分钟[TSA 校正 95%CI:118, 205,p<0.00001;33 项试验])和右美托咪定(292 分钟[TSA 校正 95%CI:245-329,p<0.00001;53 项试验]),但右美托咪定的延长作用比可乐定更显著(205 分钟[TSA 校正 95%CI:157, 254,p<0.00001;19 项试验])。与安慰剂相比,右美托咪定与心动过缓相关(RR 4.2 [95% CI 2.2, 8.3]),可乐定(RR 4.5 [95% CI 1.1, 18.3])和右美托咪定(RR 3.9 [95% CI 2.0, 7.5])均与低血压相关。严重不良反应主要与阻滞技术有关。GRADE 评价的证据质量为低或极低。

结论

α2 受体激动剂作为 BPB 的辅助药物可延长镇痛时间,其中右美托咪定效果最显著。α2 受体激动剂与心血管不良事件风险增加相关。证据质量为低至极低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验