• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症患者的院际转运:一项对患者和转运特征的前瞻性观察研究。

Interhospital transport of critically ill patients: A prospective observational study of patient and transport characteristics.

机构信息

Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Feb;66(2):248-255. doi: 10.1111/aas.14005. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1111/aas.14005
PMID:34811736
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cohort of critically ill patients transported between Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Norway has not been studied previously. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients and transports for different types of interhospital transfers and explore whether there were differences in morbidity and mortality between the different transfer categories and the general Norwegian ICU population.

METHODS

All transports of critically ill adult patients transferred between two geographically different Intensive Care Units during a one-year period were registered. Patient and transport data were obtained from The Norwegian Intensive Care Registry, The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, the hospital Electronic Patient Journal, the Air Ambulance Journal System, and the Emergency Medical Communication Centre database.

RESULTS

821 transports of 788 surgical and medical patients were enrolled. Simplified Acute Physiology Scores (SAPSII) were 43, 36 and 38 for urgent secondary transport, non-urgent secondary transport and return transfers, respectively. These were comparable to nationwide SAPSII scores that were 40 for university hospitals and 34 for local hospitals during the same time period. The return transfers had a median SOFA-score of 4.7 and 53% were mechanically ventilated. Only 33% of return transfers were performed by established teams.

CONCLUSION

Intensive care patients transferred between ICUs are as critically ill as the rest of the ICU population, with a similar morbidity and mortality. The return transfers of ICU-patients appear under-triaged compared to secondary transports in terms of allocated resources.

摘要

背景

在挪威,此前尚未对 ICU 之间转运的危重症患者队列进行研究。本研究旨在描述不同类型院内转运患者和转运的特征,并探讨不同转运类别与一般挪威 ICU 人群之间在发病率和死亡率方面是否存在差异。

方法

在一年期间,对两个地理位置不同的 ICU 之间转运的所有危重症成年患者的转运进行了登记。患者和转运数据来自挪威重症监护登记处、挪威死因登记处、医院电子患者病历、空中救护日志系统和紧急医疗通信中心数据库。

结果

共纳入了 788 例外科和内科患者的 821 次转运。紧急二次转运、非紧急二次转运和返回转运的简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)分别为 43、36 和 38。这些评分与全国性 SAPS II 评分相当,同期大学医院的 SAPS II 评分为 40,当地医院为 34。返回转运的 SOFA 评分中位数为 4.7,53%的患者接受机械通气。只有 33%的返回转运是由固定团队进行的。

结论

与 ICU 内其他患者相比,在 ICU 之间转运的危重症患者同样病重,发病率和死亡率相似。与二次转运相比,在资源配置方面,返回转运的 ICU 患者似乎分诊不足。

相似文献

1
Interhospital transport of critically ill patients: A prospective observational study of patient and transport characteristics.危重症患者的院际转运:一项对患者和转运特征的前瞻性观察研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Feb;66(2):248-255. doi: 10.1111/aas.14005. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Quality of interhospital transport of the critically ill: impact of a Mobile Intensive Care Unit with a specialized retrieval team.危重症患者院际转运的质量:配备专业救援团队的移动重症监护单元的影响。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R75. doi: 10.1186/cc10064. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
3
Quality of interhospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective audit.危重症患者院际转运质量:一项前瞻性审计
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):R446-51. doi: 10.1186/cc3749. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
4
Interhospital transport of critically ill patients: experiences and challenges, a qualitative study.危重症患者的院际转运:经验与挑战,一项定性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 4;27(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0604-8.
5
Critical Care Utilization and Outcomes of Interhospital Medical Transfers at Lower Risk of Death.低死亡风险的院际间医疗转运的重症监护利用和结局。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 May;37(5):679-685. doi: 10.1177/08850666211022613. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Comparison of interhospital pediatric intensive care transport accompanied by a referring specialist or a specialist retrieval team.由转诊专科医生或专科急救团队陪同的院际儿科重症监护转运的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):302-308. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2066-7. Epub 2003 Nov 15.
7
Prospective observational study on tracheal tube cuff pressures in emergency patients--is neglecting the problem the problem?急诊患者气管导管套囊压力的前瞻性观察研究——忽视问题就是问题所在吗?
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Dec 4;21:83. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-83.
8
Effect of Specialized Critical Care Transport Unit on Short-Term Mortality of Critically ILL Patients Undergoing Interhospital Transport.专科化危重症转运单元对院间转运危重症患者短期病死率的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Jan-Feb;24(1):46-54. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1607959. Epub 2019 May 13.
9
Effect of Interhospital ICU Relocation on Patient Physiology and Clinical Outcomes.院内 ICU 迁移对患者生理机能和临床结局的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1010-1016. doi: 10.1177/0885066617726754. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
10
Outcome of critically ill patients undergoing interhospital transfer.危重症患者院间转运的结局
Med J Aust. 2001 Feb 5;174(3):122-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143182.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Period of hospitalization and mortality in transferred versus non-transferred COVID-19 patients: results from Germany.COVID-19 患者中转诊与非转诊患者的住院时间和死亡率:来自德国的结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 28;14(1):7338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57272-y.
2
Unit-to-unit transfer due to shortage of intensive care beds in Sweden 2015-2019 was associated with a lower risk of death but a longer intensive care stay compared to no transfer: a registry study.2015年至2019年瑞典因重症监护床位短缺而进行的单位间转诊与较低的死亡风险相关,但与未转诊相比,重症监护住院时间更长:一项登记研究。
J Intensive Care. 2024 Feb 27;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00722-6.