Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Feb;66(2):248-255. doi: 10.1111/aas.14005. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
The cohort of critically ill patients transported between Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Norway has not been studied previously. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients and transports for different types of interhospital transfers and explore whether there were differences in morbidity and mortality between the different transfer categories and the general Norwegian ICU population.
All transports of critically ill adult patients transferred between two geographically different Intensive Care Units during a one-year period were registered. Patient and transport data were obtained from The Norwegian Intensive Care Registry, The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, the hospital Electronic Patient Journal, the Air Ambulance Journal System, and the Emergency Medical Communication Centre database.
821 transports of 788 surgical and medical patients were enrolled. Simplified Acute Physiology Scores (SAPSII) were 43, 36 and 38 for urgent secondary transport, non-urgent secondary transport and return transfers, respectively. These were comparable to nationwide SAPSII scores that were 40 for university hospitals and 34 for local hospitals during the same time period. The return transfers had a median SOFA-score of 4.7 and 53% were mechanically ventilated. Only 33% of return transfers were performed by established teams.
Intensive care patients transferred between ICUs are as critically ill as the rest of the ICU population, with a similar morbidity and mortality. The return transfers of ICU-patients appear under-triaged compared to secondary transports in terms of allocated resources.
在挪威,此前尚未对 ICU 之间转运的危重症患者队列进行研究。本研究旨在描述不同类型院内转运患者和转运的特征,并探讨不同转运类别与一般挪威 ICU 人群之间在发病率和死亡率方面是否存在差异。
在一年期间,对两个地理位置不同的 ICU 之间转运的所有危重症成年患者的转运进行了登记。患者和转运数据来自挪威重症监护登记处、挪威死因登记处、医院电子患者病历、空中救护日志系统和紧急医疗通信中心数据库。
共纳入了 788 例外科和内科患者的 821 次转运。紧急二次转运、非紧急二次转运和返回转运的简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)分别为 43、36 和 38。这些评分与全国性 SAPS II 评分相当,同期大学医院的 SAPS II 评分为 40,当地医院为 34。返回转运的 SOFA 评分中位数为 4.7,53%的患者接受机械通气。只有 33%的返回转运是由固定团队进行的。
与 ICU 内其他患者相比,在 ICU 之间转运的危重症患者同样病重,发病率和死亡率相似。与二次转运相比,在资源配置方面,返回转运的 ICU 患者似乎分诊不足。