Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, 27271Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Children's Cancer Research Institute, 535811Vienna, Austria.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Jan;31(1):76-86. doi: 10.1177/09622802211041756. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Generalised pseudo-values have been suggested to evaluate the impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on childhood leukaemia. The approach compares long-term survival of two cohorts defined by the availability or non-availability of suitable donors for stem cell transplantation. A patient's cohort membership becomes known only after completed donor search with or without an identified donor. If a patient suffers an event during donor search, stem cell transplantation will no longer be indicated. In such a case, donor search will be ceased and cohort membership will remain unknown. The generalised pseudo-values approach considers donor identification as binary time-dependent covariate and uses inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting to adjust for non-identified donors. The approach leads to time-consuming computations due to multiple redefinitions of the risk set for pseudo-value calculation and an explicit adjustment for waiting-time bias. Here, the problem is looked at from a different angle. By considering the probability that a donor would have been identified after ceasing of donor search, weights for common pseudo-values are defined. This leads to a faster alternative approach as only a single risk set is necessary. Extensive computer simulations show that both, the generalised and the new weighted pseudo-values approach, provide approximately unbiased estimates. Confidence interval coverage is satisfactory for typical clinical scenarios. In situations, where donor identification takes considerably longer than usual, the weighted pseudo-values approach is preferable. Both approaches complement each other as they have different potential in addressing further aspects of the underlying medical question.
广义拟似然值已被建议用于评估异基因干细胞移植对儿童白血病的影响。该方法比较了两组患者的长期生存情况,这两组患者的区别在于是否有合适的干细胞移植供体。只有在完成供体搜索后,才能知道患者属于哪一组,无论是否找到了合适的供体。如果患者在供体搜索过程中发生了事件,那么干细胞移植将不再适用。在这种情况下,将停止供体搜索,而患者的组群归属将保持未知。广义拟似然值方法将供体识别视为二元时间相关协变量,并使用逆概率删失加权来调整未识别的供体。由于需要多次重新定义拟似然值计算的风险集,以及对等待时间偏差的显式调整,这种方法会导致计算量很大。在这里,我们从不同的角度来看待这个问题。通过考虑在停止供体搜索后确定供体的概率,可以为常见的拟似然值定义权重。这可以得到一个更快的替代方法,因为只需要一个风险集。广泛的计算机模拟表明,广义和新加权拟似然值方法都提供了近似无偏的估计。对于典型的临床情况,置信区间覆盖是令人满意的。在供体识别所需时间明显长于通常情况下的情况下,加权拟似然值方法更为可取。这两种方法可以相互补充,因为它们在解决潜在医学问题的其他方面具有不同的潜力。