The New UK National Kidney Allocation Scheme With Maximized "R4-D4" Kidney Transplants: Better Patient-to-Graft Longevity Matching May Be at the Cost of More Resources.

OBJECTIVES

A new kidney matching scheme for allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation was introduced in the United Kingdom in September 2019. Donors and recipients are stratified into quartiles derived from demographic and retrieval indices associated with risk of adverse outcome. We present data on 2 years of transplants, with the aim of understanding the potential impacts ofthe scheme on patient/transplant outcomes, hospitalization, and resource utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All deceased donortransplants from 2015 and 2016 were reclassified using the risk quartiles (D1-D4 for donor and R1-R4 for recipient, where 4 is highestrisk). Inpatientlength of stay, kidney function defined by estimated glomerular rate at 1 year, and patient survival data were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 195 deceased donor transplants analyzed, 144 recipients (73.4%) were in the highest risk R4 category, including 55 with R4-D4 combination (28.1%). Recipients in the R4 category had longer index admissions (mean of 12.4 vs 8.1 days for R1-R3; P = .002) and higher subsequent admission rates 90 days posttransplant(185.7 vs 122.7/1000 patient days for R1-R3; P < .001). Kidney transplant function at 1 year was lower for grafts categorized as D4 (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 35.7 vs 54.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for D1-D3; P < .001). However, survival for R4 recipients with D4 kidneys was not significantly differentfrom R4 recipients with D1 to D3 kidneys (4-year patient survival rate with R4-D4 combination was 90.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The principles ofthe allocation scheme in matching graft and patient survival were already largely being observed (matching higher risk deceased donor kidneys to higher risk recipients). However, an increase in D4 proportions in the R4 group may be associated with longer hospitalization posttransplant. Consideration should be given to mitigation strategies to address this. Despite poorer graft function, patient survival appears satisfactory.