Klein Toni Maria, Blome Christine, Kleyn C Elise, Conrad Curdin, Sator Paul G, Ståhle Mona, Eyerich Kilian, Radtke Marc Alexander, Bundy Christine, Cordey Myriam, Griffiths Christopher E M, Augustin Matthias
Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
The Dermatology Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Jan;12(1):81-95. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00628-3. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
In the real-world APPRECIATE study (NCT02740218), most patients with psoriasis demonstrated notable improvements on disease severity measures and reported clinically meaningful treatment benefits with apremilast.
We aim to further describe patient-relevant needs and benefits and patient satisfaction with apremilast, including subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics.
APPRECIATE, a multinational, retrospective, cross-sectional study, enrolled patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who started apremilast according to the European label. Patient Benefit Index (PBI; range 0 (no patient-relevant benefit) to 4 (maximum patient-relevant benefit), global PBI score ≥ 1 indicating minimum patient-relevant benefit and ≥ 3 indicating high benefit) and nine-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9; range 0-100) were assessed 6 (± 1) months after apremilast initiation and summarized descriptively. Relationships between global PBI and TSQM-9 assessments were analyzed by Pearson correlations.
Of 480 enrolled patients, 347 (72.3%) had remained on apremilast at 6 (± 1) months; 90.9% (300/330) achieved global PBI score ≥ 1. Mean (standard deviation) global PBI score was 2.8 (1.2). Higher achievement of global PBI score ≥ 3 was observed in patients with no prior treatments (61.1% (22/36)) or prior phototherapy (64.6% (42/65)) versus prior conventional systemic (54.4% (100/184)) or biologic (38.6% (17/44)) treatment. Strong correlations were observed between the global PBI score and the TSQM-9 global satisfaction and effectiveness subscale scores.
Patients continuing apremilast for 6 (± 1) months in APPRECIATE reported patient-relevant treatment benefits. Findings suggest that receiving apremilast earlier versus later in treatment management is consistent with greater improvements in patient-relevant treatment outcomes.
在现实世界的APPRECIATE研究(NCT02740218)中,大多数银屑病患者在疾病严重程度指标上有显著改善,并报告阿普米拉斯具有临床意义的治疗益处。
我们旨在进一步描述与患者相关的需求和益处以及患者对阿普米拉斯的满意度,包括基于患者特征的亚组分析。
APPRECIATE是一项跨国、回顾性、横断面研究,纳入了根据欧洲标签开始使用阿普米拉斯的慢性斑块状银屑病患者。在开始使用阿普米拉斯6(±1)个月后评估患者获益指数(PBI;范围为0(无患者相关获益)至4(最大患者相关获益),全球PBI评分≥1表示有最低患者相关获益,≥3表示有高获益)和九项药物治疗满意度问卷(TSQM-9;范围为0-100),并进行描述性总结。通过Pearson相关性分析全球PBI与TSQM-9评估之间的关系。
在480名纳入的患者中,347名(72.3%)在6(±1)个月时仍在使用阿普米拉斯;90.9%(300/330)的患者全球PBI评分≥1。全球PBI评分的平均值(标准差)为2.8(1.2)。与既往接受过传统全身治疗(54.4%(100/184))或生物治疗(38.6%(17/44))的患者相比,未接受过治疗(61.1%(22/36))或既往接受过光疗(64.6%(42/65))的患者中全球PBI评分≥3的比例更高。全球PBI评分与TSQM-9全球满意度和有效性子量表评分之间存在强相关性。
在APPRECIATE研究中持续使用阿普米拉斯6(±1)个月的患者报告了与患者相关的治疗益处。研究结果表明,在治疗管理中尽早而非较晚接受阿普米拉斯与患者相关治疗结局的更大改善相一致。