• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和成人的额中theta 振荡与冲突监测。

Midfrontal theta oscillations and conflict monitoring in children and adults.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Hearing Sciences-Scottish Section, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, University of Nottingham, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Dev Psychobiol. 2021 Dec;63(8):e22216. doi: 10.1002/dev.22216.

DOI:10.1002/dev.22216
PMID:34813101
Abstract

Conflict monitoring is central in cognitive control, as detection of conflict serves as a signal for the need to engage control. This study examined whether (1) midfrontal theta oscillations similarly support conflict monitoring in children and adults, and (2) performance monitoring difficulty influences conflict monitoring and resolution. Children (n = 25) and adults (n = 24) completed a flanker task with fair or rigged response feedback. Relative to adults, children showed a smaller congruency effect on midfrontal theta power, overall lower midfrontal theta power and coherence, and (unlike adults) no correlation between midfrontal theta power and N2 amplitude, suggesting that reduced neural communication efficiency contributes to less efficient conflict monitoring in children than adults. In both age groups, response feedback fairness affected response times and the P3, but neither midfrontal theta oscillations nor the N2, indicating that performance monitoring difficulty influenced conflict resolution but not conflict monitoring.

摘要

冲突监测在认知控制中至关重要,因为冲突的检测可以作为需要进行控制的信号。本研究旨在探讨:(1)额中theta 振荡是否同样支持儿童和成人的冲突监测;(2)绩效监测难度是否会影响冲突监测和解决。儿童(n=25)和成人(n=24)完成了一项带有公平或作弊反馈的侧抑制任务。与成人相比,儿童在额中theta 功率上的一致性效应较小,额中theta 功率和相干性总体较低,而且(与成人不同)额中 theta 功率与 N2 振幅之间没有相关性,这表明与成人相比,儿童的神经通讯效率降低,导致其冲突监测效率较低。在两个年龄组中,反馈公平性都影响了反应时和 P3,但额中 theta 振荡和 N2 都没有受到影响,这表明绩效监测难度影响了冲突解决,但不影响冲突监测。

相似文献

1
Midfrontal theta oscillations and conflict monitoring in children and adults.儿童和成人的额中theta 振荡与冲突监测。
Dev Psychobiol. 2021 Dec;63(8):e22216. doi: 10.1002/dev.22216.
2
Dynamic Adjustments of Midfrontal Control Signals in Adults and Adolescents.成人和青少年额中控制信号的动态调整。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 5;31(2):795-808. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa258.
3
Midfrontal theta phase coordinates behaviorally relevant brain computations during cognitive control.额中θ相位坐标在认知控制期间对行为相关的大脑计算进行编码。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116340. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116340. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.运动干扰而非感觉干扰增加反应性控制过程中的额中theta 活动和大脑同步性。
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 24;41(8):1788-1801. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1682-20.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Midfrontal theta as moderator between beta oscillations and precision control.前额θ波作为β振荡与精准控制之间的调节者。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jul 15;235:118022. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118022. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
6
Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior.额前冲突相关的θ波段功率反映了预测行为的神经振荡。
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;110(12):2752-63. doi: 10.1152/jn.00479.2013. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
7
Target Amplification and Distractor Inhibition: Theta Oscillatory Dynamics of Selective Attention in a Flanker Task.目标扩增与干扰抑制:在 Flanker 任务中选择性注意的 theta 振荡动力学。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr;21(2):355-371. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00876-y. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Proactive control without midfrontal control signals? The role of midfrontal oscillations in preparatory conflict adjustments.无需额前控制信号的主动控制?额前振荡在预备冲突调整中的作用。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Nov;148:107747. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107747. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
9
Learning to Synchronize: Midfrontal Theta Dynamics during Rule Switching.学习同步:规则切换过程中的额中Theta 动力学。
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 17;41(7):1516-1528. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-20.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
10
Multiple Midfrontal Thetas Revealed by Source Separation of Simultaneous MEG and EEG.通过同时进行的 MEG 和 EEG 的源分离揭示多个额中Theta 波。
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 30;40(40):7702-7713. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0321-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Oscillatory Markers of Voluntary Task Switching: Proactive Engagement of Self-Directed Control in Children and Adults.自主任务切换的神经振荡标记:儿童和成人自我导向控制的主动参与
Dev Sci. 2025 Nov;28(6):e70073. doi: 10.1111/desc.70073.
2
Threat context impairs cognitive control of neutral words processing in social anxiety individuals: evidence from ERP and theta oscillations.威胁情境会损害社交焦虑个体对中性词加工的认知控制:来自ERP和θ振荡的证据。
BMC Neurosci. 2025 Aug 28;26(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12868-025-00976-2.
3
Midfrontal theta is associated with errors, but no evidence for a link with error-related memory.
额中回θ波与错误相关,但没有证据表明其与错误相关记忆存在联系。
Neuroimage Rep. 2022 Aug 30;2(4):100129. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100129. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Quantitative Electroencephalographic Measures of Voltage Amplitude and Dominant Frequency Associated With the Stroop Color-Conflict Cognitive-Interference Task in Medical Students.医学生在斯特鲁普颜色冲突认知干扰任务中与电压幅度和主频相关的定量脑电图测量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 18;17(6):e86277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86277. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
What Is the Relationship between Metacognition and Mental Effort in Executive Functions? The Contribution of Neurophysiology.元认知与执行功能中的心理努力之间的关系是什么?神经生理学的贡献。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 10;13(11):918. doi: 10.3390/bs13110918.
6
EEG Dynamics of Error Processing and Associated Behavioral Adjustments in Preschool Children.学龄前儿童错误处理的脑电图动态变化及相关行为调整
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 29;13(4):575. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040575.
7
Genetic Overlap Between Midfrontal Theta Signals and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Longitudinal Twin Cohort.前额叶θ波信号与注意缺陷多动障碍和自闭症谱系障碍在纵向双胞胎队列中的遗传重叠。
Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 15;94(10):823-832. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 13.