Suppr超能文献

东亚人群短期双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和随机临床试验的荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in East Asians: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; and.

Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 24;79(3):264-272. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001181.

Abstract

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients implanted with new-generation drug-eluting stents in East Asians is currently still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-term DAPT in patients with those. In this study, randomized controlled trials from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to compare the efficacy and safety of short-term DAPT (6 months or less) with long-term DAPT (12 months or more) in patients implanted with new-generation drug-eluting stents in East Asian from inception to September 2020. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause death, the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite or possible stent thrombosis, and stroke. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials with 15,688 patients met inclusion criteria; there were no significant differences in the incidence of all-cause death [risk ratio (RR), 1.03; 0.76-1.39; P = 0.856)], cardiovascular death (RR, 0.83; 0.55-1.24; P = 0.361), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.97; 0.72-1.31; P = 0.853), definite or possible stent thrombosis (RR, 1.52; 0.83-2.78; P = 0.170), and stroke (RR, 0.90; 0.61-1.31; P = 0.574) between short-term and long-term DAPTs. However, there was a significant difference in the risk of major bleeding (RR, 0.64; 0.49-0.85; P = 0.002) between the 2 groups. Compared with long-term DAPT, the short-term DAPT can reduce the risk of major bleeding without increasing the risk of death or ischemia for East Asians (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD42020213266).

摘要

东亚地区新一代药物洗脱支架置入患者双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间目前仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在研究短期 DAPT(6 个月或更短时间)与长期 DAPT(12 个月或更长时间)在东亚地区新一代药物洗脱支架置入患者中的疗效和安全性。本研究从建库至 2020 年 9 月,通过 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 检索了比较短期 DAPT(6 个月或更短时间)与长期 DAPT(12 个月或更长时间)在东亚地区新一代药物洗脱支架置入患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。主要疗效结局为全因死亡,主要安全性结局为大出血,次要结局包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死、明确或可能的支架血栓形成和卒中等。共有 6 项随机对照试验,纳入了 15688 例患者,符合纳入标准;全因死亡发生率无显著差异[风险比(RR)1.03;0.76-1.39;P=0.856]、心血管死亡(RR,0.83;0.55-1.24;P=0.361)、心肌梗死(RR,0.97;0.72-1.31;P=0.853)、明确或可能的支架血栓形成(RR,1.52;0.83-2.78;P=0.170)和卒中等(RR,0.90;0.61-1.31;P=0.574)。然而,两组大出血风险存在显著差异(RR,0.64;0.49-0.85;P=0.002)。与长期 DAPT 相比,短期 DAPT 可降低大出血风险,而不会增加东亚地区患者的死亡或缺血风险(由 PROSPERO 注册,CRD42020213266)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a4c/8893122/f457188b42d2/jcvp-79-264-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验