Suppr超能文献

8.5 年至 13.2 年长期使用下颌舌弓的效果。

Effects of long-term use of the lower lingual arch from 8.5 years to 13.2 years.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):189-196. doi: 10.2319/052221-408.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of long-term use of the lower lingual arch (LLA) on the sagittal and vertical positions of the permanent lower incisors and first molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample consisted of 98 patients who were treated with an LLA (LLA group) and 39 patients who were treated without an LLA (no-LLA group). The positional changes of the lower incisors and first molars were analyzed after performing mandibular structural superimpositions on lateral cephalometric radiographs taken before treatment (T1) and at the end of LLA therapy (T2). The mean ages at T1 and T2 were 8.5 years and 13.2 years, respectively. Study casts were analyzed to quantify arch dimensional changes.

RESULTS

Mesial movement of the lower molar cusp was similar between the LLA and no-LLA groups, but the vertical position was slightly greater at T2 in the LLA group. In the LLA group, there was a molar tip-back effect, and the lower incisors were proclined 4.2° more than in the no-LLA group. Arch perimeter decreased 3.6 ± 2.6 mm without an LLA and 0.97 ± 3.7 mm with an LLA. Intercanine and intermolar widths both increased about 1 mm more with an LLA (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The LLA does not seem to restrict mesial movement and vertical eruption of the lower incisors and molars in the long term. The LLA effectively preserves the arch perimeter at the expense of a slight lower incisor proclination.

摘要

目的

研究长期使用下颌舌弓(LLA)对恒下切牙和第一磨牙矢状和垂直位置的影响。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 98 例接受 LLA 治疗的患者(LLA 组)和 39 例未接受 LLA 治疗的患者(无 LLA 组)。在治疗前(T1)和 LLA 治疗结束时(T2)的侧位头颅侧位片上进行下颌结构叠加,分析下切牙和第一磨牙的位置变化。T1 和 T2 的平均年龄分别为 8.5 岁和 13.2 岁。研究模型用于分析弓尺寸变化。

结果

LLA 组和无 LLA 组的下颌磨牙牙尖向近中移动相似,但 LLA 组 T2 时的垂直位置略大。LLA 组存在磨牙后倾效应,下切牙前倾 4.2°,明显大于无 LLA 组。无 LLA 时,弓周长减少 3.6 ± 2.6mm,LLA 时减少 0.97 ± 3.7mm。LLA 组的尖牙间和磨牙间宽度均增加约 1mm(P<0.0001)。

结论

长期使用 LLA 似乎不会限制下切牙和磨牙的近中移动和垂直萌出。LLA 有效地保持了弓周长,代价是下切牙略微前倾。

相似文献

2
Lower arch perimeter preservation using the lingual arch.使用舌弓保持下牙弓周长
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Oct;112(4):449-56. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70054-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective study of Class II mixed-dentition treatment.一项关于II类混合牙列治疗的回顾性研究。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Jan;87(1):56-67. doi: 10.2319/012616-72.1. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
3
Effectiveness of a lower lingual arch as a space holding device.下颌舌弓作为保持间隙装置的有效性。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):37-42. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq022. Epub 2010 Jul 25.
6
Lower arch perimeter preservation using the lingual arch.使用舌弓保持下牙弓周长
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Oct;112(4):449-56. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70054-4.
10
Mixed dentition treatment with cervical traction and lower lingual arch.采用颈部牵引和下颌舌弓进行混合牙列期治疗。
Angle Orthod. 1983 Oct;53(4):329-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1983)053<0329:MDTWCT>2.0.CO;2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验