Odom W M
Angle Orthod. 1983 Oct;53(4):329-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1983)053<0329:MDTWCT>2.0.CO;2.
The quantitative changes which occurred as the result of this specific regimen of treatment in a sample of Class II malocclusions in the early mixed dentition were compared with like changes in a closely matched sample of untreated Class II malocclusions. Selected parameters were also compared with a comparable group of Class II malocclusions treated with only a Kloehn cervical appliance. Treatment as described does tend to slightly increase the vertical eruption of the upper molar. No maxillary orthopedic effects were noted in the horizontal plane. There was significant inhibition of the forward displacement of the upper molar. Cervical traction without anterior bands resulted in actual distal movement of the upper molar, not just an inhibition of its forward growth. The treatment significantly inhibited the forward growth of the upper incisors and point A. Cervical traction alone had less effect on overjet and the S-N-A angle. A lingual arch is effective in maintaining lower leeway space while still allowing horizontal and vertical growth changes in the positions of molars and incisors. Rotation of the mandible was downward and backward. Overall face height was increased.
将早期混合牙列中II类错牙合样本接受这种特定治疗方案后发生的定量变化,与未治疗的II类错牙合匹配样本中的类似变化进行了比较。还将选定参数与仅使用克洛恩颈牵引矫治器治疗的II类错牙合可比组进行了比较。所述治疗确实倾向于使上颌磨牙的垂直萌出略有增加。在水平面上未观察到上颌矫形效果。上颌磨牙的向前移位受到显著抑制。没有前带的颈牵引导致上颌磨牙实际向远中移动,而不仅仅是抑制其向前生长。该治疗显著抑制了上颌切牙和A点的向前生长。单纯颈牵引对覆盖和S-N-A角的影响较小。舌弓在维持下颌剩余间隙方面有效,同时仍允许磨牙和切牙位置在水平和垂直方向上生长变化。下颌发生向下和向后旋转。全面高增加。