School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2022 Mar;10(3):e571. doi: 10.1002/iid3.571. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
The combination of the antihistamine azelastine (AZE) with the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) in a single spray, has been reported to be significantly more effective at reducing allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms than treatment with either corticosteroid or antihistamine monotherapy. However, the biological basis for enhanced symptom relief is not known. This study aimed to compare gene expression profiles (760 immune genes, performed with the NanoString nCounter) from peripheral blood and nasal brushing/lavage lysate samples in response to nasal spray treatment.
Moderate/severe persistent dust mite AR sufferers received either AZE (125 μg/spray) nasal spray (n = 16), FP (50 μg/spray) nasal spray (n = 14) or combination spray AZE/FP (125 μg AZE and 50 μg FP/spray) (n = 14) for 7 days, twice daily. Self-reported symptom questionnaires were completed daily for the study duration. Gene expression analysis (760 immune genes) was performed with the NanoString nCounter on purified RNA from peripheral blood and nasal brushing/lavage lysate samples.
In nasal samples, 206 genes were significantly differentially expressed following FP treatment; 182 genes downregulated (-2.57 to -0.45 Log2 fold change [FC]), 24 genes upregulated (0.49-1.40 Log2 FC). In response to AZE/FP, only 16 genes were significantly differentially expressed; 10 genes downregulated (-1.53 to -0.58 Log2 FC), six genes upregulated (1.07-1.62 Log2 FC). Following AZE treatment only five genes were significantly differentially expressed; one gene downregulated (-1.68 Log2 FC), four genes upregulated (0.59-1.19 Log2 FC). Immune gene changes in peripheral blood samples following treatment were minimal. AR symptoms improved under all treatments, but improvements were less pronounced following AZE treatment.
AZE/FP, FP, and AZE had diverse effects on immune gene expression profiles in nasal mucosa samples. The moderate number of genes modulated by AZE/FP indicates alternative pathways in reducing AR symptoms whilst avoiding extensive local immune suppression.
抗组胺药阿扎司琼(AZE)与皮质类固醇丙酸氟替卡松(FP)联合制成单一喷雾,据报道,在减轻过敏性鼻炎(AR)症状方面,其效果明显优于皮质类固醇或抗组胺单药治疗。然而,增强症状缓解的生物学基础尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较外周血和鼻冲洗/灌洗液裂解物样本的基因表达谱(760 个免疫基因,采用 NanoString nCounter 进行检测),以评估鼻喷雾治疗的反应。
中重度持续性尘螨性 AR 患者接受 AZE(125μg/喷)鼻喷雾剂(n=16)、FP(50μg/喷)鼻喷雾剂(n=14)或 AZE/FP 联合喷雾(125μg AZE 和 50μg FP/喷)(n=14),每天两次,共 7 天。在研究期间,患者每天完成自我报告的症状问卷。采用 NanoString nCounter 对纯化的外周血和鼻冲洗/灌洗液裂解物样本中的 RNA 进行基因表达分析(760 个免疫基因)。
在鼻腔样本中,FP 治疗后有 206 个基因表达显著差异;182 个基因下调(-2.57 至-0.45 Log2 倍变化 [FC]),24 个基因上调(0.49-1.40 Log2 FC)。对 AZE/FP 反应仅 16 个基因表达显著差异;10 个基因下调(-1.53 至-0.58 Log2 FC),6 个基因上调(1.07-1.62 Log2 FC)。AZE 治疗后仅有 5 个基因表达显著差异;1 个基因下调(-1.68 Log2 FC),4 个基因上调(0.59-1.19 Log2 FC)。治疗后外周血样本中的免疫基因变化很小。所有治疗均改善了 AR 症状,但 AZE 治疗后的改善程度较轻。
AZE/FP、FP 和 AZE 对鼻腔黏膜样本中的免疫基因表达谱有不同的影响。AZE/FP 调节的基因数量适中,表明在减轻 AR 症状的同时避免局部免疫抑制的替代途径。