Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Mayo Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Oral Oncol. 2021 Dec;123:105625. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105625. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Extranodal extension (ENE) and more than 4 pathologically involved lymph nodes (pN2) are critical prognostic factors in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV(+) OPSCC). We analyze a patient cohort with HPV(+) OPSCC to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CT and PET/CT in identifying involvement of more than 4 lymph nodes (rN2) compared to pN2 and radiographic ENE (rENE) compared to pathologic ENE (pENE).
MATERIALS/METHODS: The dataset consisted of 261 patients enrolled in two prospective clinical trials. All imaging studies were independently reviewed by a blinded neuroradiologist, classifying the presence or absence of rENE and rN2. Secondary analyses included correlations of imaging accuracy and pathologic size of the primary tumor.
CT demonstrated sensitivity of 59%, specificity of 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 53%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%, and accuracy of 88% for pN2. PET/CT showed similar results. Patients with up to 4 involved lymph nodes (rN0-1) had a 93-94% chance of remaining pN0-1. CT and PET/CT identified an equal number of involved nodes in 81% of patients. CT demonstrated sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 71%, PPV of 72%, NPV of 53%, and accuracy of 62% for pENE. PET/CT showed similar outcomes. Notably, when multiple radiographic criteria were used to identify rENE, PPV increased for both CT (84%) and PET/CT (79%).
Patients with rN0-1 had a 93-94% chance of remaining pN0-1, suggesting rN0-1 could effectively stratify patients for clinical trials and treatment de-escalation. While CT and PET/CT were highly correlated, both showed low sensitivity for identifying pENE.
结外侵犯(ENE)和 4 个以上病理性受累淋巴结(pN2)是 HPV 相关口咽癌(HPV(+) OPSCC)的关键预后因素。我们分析了一组 HPV(+) OPSCC 患者,以确定 CT 和 PET/CT 在识别 4 个以上淋巴结(rN2)受累与 pN2、放射性 ENE(rENE)与病理性 ENE(pENE)相比的敏感性和特异性。
数据集包括 261 名入组两项前瞻性临床试验的患者。所有影像学研究均由一名盲法神经放射科医师独立进行评估,分类存在或不存在 rENE 和 rN2。二次分析包括对影像学准确性和原发肿瘤病理大小的相关性分析。
CT 对 pN2 的诊断敏感性为 59%,特异性为 92%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 53%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 94%,准确性为 88%。PET/CT 显示出相似的结果。对于最多有 4 个受累淋巴结(rN0-1)的患者,其保持 pN0-1 的可能性为 93-94%。CT 和 PET/CT 在 81%的患者中识别出相同数量的受累淋巴结。CT 对 pENE 的诊断敏感性为 54%,特异性为 71%,PPV 为 72%,NPV 为 53%,准确性为 62%。PET/CT 显示出相似的结果。值得注意的是,当使用多个放射影像学标准来识别 rENE 时,CT(84%)和 PET/CT(79%)的 PPV 均有所提高。
rN0-1 的患者有 93-94%的可能保持 pN0-1,这表明 rN0-1 可有效地对患者进行临床试验和治疗降级分层。尽管 CT 和 PET/CT 高度相关,但两者对识别 pENE 的敏感性均较低。